Yash Optics (YASHOPTICS)

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Strengths

• Sales growth of 19.90% shows demand momentum in the business
• Latest quarterly revenue of ₹23 Cr indicates an active operating scale
• ROCE of 17.24% suggests reasonably efficient capital usage
• Promoter holding of 73.19% aligns promoters with minority shareholders

Concerns

• Profit growth fell 31.43%, meaning top-line growth is not reaching the bottom line
• P/E of 33.67 is expensive relative to declining earnings and a 0% dividend yield
• Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals weak overall financial health
• No book value, debt-equity, or return-on-equity data makes balance sheet risk unquantifiable

AI Analysis

When I evaluate Yash Optics, I start by asking whether the business earns a decent return on capital and whether it can keep doing so. The ROCE of 17.24% is respectable, but the missing book value and debt-equity data trouble me. I cannot assess the true balance sheet strength. The market cap is ₹275 Cr with a price of ₹115, and the P/E stands at 33.67. That is a demanding price for a company whose profit fell 31.43%. Sales grew 19.90%, and the latest quarter shows ₹23 Cr in sales and ₹3 Cr in net profit, yet that growth is not translating into earnings. The Piotroski F-score of 4/9 tells me financial health is weak on several tested parameters. There is no dividend, so I get no income while I wait. A PEG ratio of 1.69 also suggests the valuation is not obviously cheap, especially when profit is declining. Promoter holding of 73.19% is a positive sign of ownership alignment, but it also means low free float and potentially distorted price moves. At ₹115, within the 52-week range of ₹97.50 to ₹153.50, I see no margin of safety. For a diversified consumer products company, I want steady earnings growth and a durable competitive advantage. Here I see sales momentum but deteriorating profitability. The market seems to expect a recovery, but I prefer to let the numbers prove it first. As Graham said, price is what you pay, value is what you get. At 33.67 times earnings with falling profits, I am being asked to pay for a future that is not yet visible. This looks like a situation to monitor, not one I would enter today.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer