Waterbase (WATERBASE)
CyclicalScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹75 |
| Market Cap | ₹310.74 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0 |
| ROCE | -10.62% |
| ROE | -9.9% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 32.74% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.42 |
| Sales Growth | 3.9% |
| Promoter Holding | 69.05% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹38 — ₹75 |
| Sector | Food Products |
| Book Value | ₹34.27 |
Strengths
- Sales growth of 52.06% shows strong revenue momentum
- Moderate leverage with Debt/Equity at 0.34
- High promoter holding of 69.05% aligns management with minority shareholders
- Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 suggests some fundamental health improvements
- Book value of ₹41.62 provides a tangible asset floor near current price
Concerns
- Ongoing net losses: latest quarter ₹3 crore loss and negative ROE/ROCE of about -10%
- No earnings, so P/E is not applicable; paying 1.21 times book for a loss-making business is not cheap
- Seafood is a commoditized, price-taker industry with no durable moat
- Profit growth of 32.74% is misleading as it only reflects lower losses, not actual profitability
AI Analysis
Let me examine Waterbase with the same skepticism I'd apply to any business. At ₹50.39, the market asks me to pay ₹216 crore for a seafood company that earned nothing. The P/E is meaningless because there are no earnings—ROE is -10.22% and ROCE is -10.62%. The latest quarter tells the same story: ₹102 crore of sales yet a ₹3 crore net loss. Growth? Yes, sales grew 52%, and profit figures improved 32.74%, but from a loss to a smaller loss is not prosperity. This is a commodity business—shrimp and seafood have no pricing power, no brand moat. As Graham would say, a company without earnings power is not an investment; it's a speculation. The balance sheet is not reckless: debt/equity at 0.34 is manageable, and book value of ₹41.62 provides some anchor. At 1.21 times book, though, I'm paying a premium for a business that is destroying value. Promoter holding of 69% aligns ownership and management—a positive sign. Piotroski score of 6/9 hints at some operational improvement. But I need margin of safety. A cyclical business near the bottom of the cycle can be rewarding, but only if the balance sheet survives and returns recover. Here, I see sales growth and controlled debt, but no earnings. I will not chase a turnaround story without proof of sustainable profitability. For now, Waterbase is a cyclical watch—not a buy.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer