Viviana Power (VIVIANA)

Fast Grower

FairStock Score: 50/100 — MIXED

Score breakdown: P/E: 1/3 · ROCE: 2/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹700.75
Market Cap₹703.72 Cr
P/E Ratio34.97
ROCE42.88%
ROE—%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth90.4%
Debt/Equity0.86
Sales Growth128.5%
Promoter Holding70.63%
52-Week Range₹565 — ₹1,860
SectorConstruction
Book Value₹107.49

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

When I look at Viviana Power, I see a small civil construction company growing at a pace that would make most investors dizzy. Sales up 226.33% and profit up 129.94% are extraordinary numbers. But extraordinary growth demands extraordinary caution. At ₹872.65, the stock sits far below its 52-week high of ₹1,860, and the market cap is only ₹649 Cr. The P/E of 22.70 is not excessive for a fast grower, and the PEG ratio of 0.13 suggests the market is pricing in much lower future growth. Yet I have to ask: is this a wonderful business or a cyclical construction name enjoying a temporary boom? The latest quarter shows ₹118 Cr sales and only ₹8 Cr profit, meaning a net margin of around 6.8%—thin, and typical of a competitive, low-moat industry. ROCE of 42.88% is genuinely impressive, and a Piotroski score of 7/9 tells me the financials are currently healthy. Promoter holding at 70.63% is reassuring. But I cannot calculate book value, debt-to-equity, or ROE from the data given, and that bothers me. As Graham would say, an investment requires a margin of safety, and I cannot fully assess that without balance sheet transparency. There is also zero dividend yield, so the investor relies entirely on price appreciation. FairStock score of 57/100 and a 'STEADY' label hardly excite me. I would not chase this stock solely on growth numbers. If the order book, cash flows, and debt levels confirm the momentum, it may deserve attention. But for now, the growth is real, yet the quality and durability remain unproven.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer