Virtual Galaxy (VGINFOTECH)
Slow GrowerScore breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 2/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹154.25 |
| Market Cap | ₹325.53 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 9.3 |
| ROCE | 44.99% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.76% |
| Profit Growth | 0% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 0% |
| Promoter Holding | 65% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹99.5 — ₹170.85 |
| Sector | IT - Software |
Strengths
- ROCE of 44.99% shows exceptional capital efficiency in an asset-light software products business.
- P/E of 9.30 with profitable operations — latest quarter net profit of ₹10 Cr on ₹41 Cr sales — offers a reasonable earnings yield.
- Promoter holding of 65% aligns management interests with minority shareholders.
- Net margin around 24% in the latest quarter indicates pricing power or cost discipline.
Concerns
- Sales growth and profit growth are both 0.00%, suggesting a stagnating business.
- Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 points to weak financial health and possible balance sheet deterioration.
- No book value, ROE, or debt/equity data limits independent verification of financial strength.
- Dividend yield of only 0.76% provides little compensation while waiting for growth.
AI Analysis
Virtual Galaxy presents a mixed case. At ₹154.25, the entire business is valued at ₹326 crore. The P/E of 9.30 looks attractive, especially alongside an ROCE of 44.99 percent. That kind of return on capital tells me this software products business does not require heavy assets to generate profits — a quality I admire. Latest quarter sales of ₹41 crore and net profit of ₹10 crore implies a net margin around 24 percent, which is respectable. Yet I must ask: where is the growth? Both sales growth and profit growth stand at 0.00 percent. A business that earns high returns but cannot grow is like a savings account with a fixed rate — useful, but not magical. The Piotroski F-Score of 3 out of 9 is a red flag. It suggests the company's financial position may have weakened, and Graham would insist on more margin of safety before relying on past profitability. Promoter holding of 65 percent is reassuring; they eat their own cooking. But the dividend yield of only 0.76 percent means the shareholder isn't being paid much while waiting. I would not classify this as a fast grower. It looks more like a slow grower — perhaps a value trap if the zero growth continues. The market cap of ₹326 crore is small, making it less followed and more volatile. Without book value, ROE, or debt figures, I cannot fully assess balance sheet strength. At this price, you're paying a reasonable multiple for a stagnating but capital-efficient business. I would want evidence of renewed order flow and margin stability before committing real money. For now, it's on my watchlist, not my wallet.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer