Udayshivakumar (USK)

Asset Play

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹21.41
Market Cap₹118.52 Cr
P/E Ratio64.88
ROCE-0.92%
ROE0.98%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth-419.33%
Debt/Equity0.45
Sales Growth-57.3%
Promoter Holding65.95%
52-Week Range₹18.97 — ₹35.17
SectorConstruction
Book Value₹30.77

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

When I look at Udayshivakumar, I see a business that fails my first test: it must earn a decent return on equity. The numbers tell a harsh story. ROE is -10.36%, ROCE is -0.92%, and the latest quarter shows ₹47 crore of sales with a ₹5 crore net loss. Profit growth has collapsed by -419.33%. This is not a wealth-creating enterprise at the moment. A Piotroski score of 3 out of 9 underlines the weak financial position. I also see no dividend, so shareholders get no compensation while waiting. Yet the valuation catches my Graham-trained eye. At ₹23.99, the share trades at 0.74 times book value of ₹32.40. That is a meaningful discount to stated assets. Debt-to-equity at 0.39 is not aggressive, and promoter holding of 65.95% is high, which aligns owners with minority shareholders. Sales growth of 5.92% is positive, but in a construction company with negative profits, growing sales can destroy value if margins do not follow. I cannot call this a moat business. Civil construction is cyclical, fragmented, and price-competitive. The low price-to-book may be a trap if assets are overvalued or if losses continue to eat equity. Book value matters only if it is real and eventually productive. This looks like an asset play or a potential turnaround, not a wonderful company. I would not buy solely because it is cheap. I need evidence that the order book is solid, working capital is under control, and quarterly losses are reversing. If management can earn even a modest positive ROE, the discount to book could be a margin of safety. Until then, I will watch and wait.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer