Urban Company (URBANCO)
Fast GrowerFairStock Score: 30/100 — RISKY
Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹144.39 |
| Market Cap | ₹21,262.01 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0 |
| ROCE | 2.37% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | -109.17% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.06 |
| Sales Growth | 43.6% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹-145 Cr |
| Promoter Holding | 20.29% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹100.7 — ₹201.18 |
| Sector | Retailing |
| Book Value | ₹13.9 |
Strengths
- High revenue growth: latest quarter sales ₹383 Cr, sales growth 32.91%, and 5yr revenue CAGR 35.77%.
- Low leverage: Debt/Equity of 0.06 and positive book value of ₹19.86 provide a financial buffer.
- Significant revenue scale implies meaningful customer adoption and market presence in online services.
Concerns
- Unprofitable and cash-burning: latest quarter net loss ₹-21 Cr, negative free cash flow ₹-145 Cr, and profit growth -109.17%.
- Expensive valuation: P/E is zero/negative, P/B is 7.27 against book value of ₹19.86, and market cap is ₹15,660 Cr.
- Weak return quality: ROCE 2.37%, ROE N/A, Piotroski F-Score 4/9, and FairStock Score 30/100 indicate risk.
- Promoter holding at 20.29% is low, raising governance and alignment concerns.
AI Analysis
At ₹144.43, Urban Company is precisely the kind of business I have to be careful with. A great-looking revenue story -- latest quarter sales ₹383 crore, up 32.91% over last year, and a five-year revenue CAGR of 35.77% -- but the numbers beneath the top line leave me cold. This company loses money: net profit in the latest quarter was minus ₹21 crore, profit growth has declined 109.17%, and free cash flow is minus ₹145 crore. You cannot value a business on a P/E when the E is zero; I prefer businesses that generate cash, not consume it. The balance sheet is clean -- debt/equity of 0.06 gives some comfort -- but low debt does not justify a price-to-book of 7.27 when book value is only ₹19.86. ROCE of 2.37% is far below what an owner should demand, and a Piotroski score of 4/9 tells me fundamentals are deteriorating, not improving. The market is paying ₹15,660 crore for a company that hasn't proven it can make a consistent rupee of profit. I like growth, but only when it is accompanied by a durable moat and margin of safety; here I see a high-multiple, cash-burning enterprise. Promoter holding of 20.29% also makes me want to watch alignment carefully. I would need to see meaningful progress toward profitability, positive free cash flow, and return on capital above the cost of capital before I would part with my money. Until then, this is a promising business at too high a price. In Graham's terms, price is what you pay; value is what you get. Here I cannot measure value with confidence, so I sit on my hands.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer