TVS Infra. Trust (TVSINVIT)

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 1/1

Key Financials

Strengths

• Latest quarter net profit of ₹14 Cr on sales of ₹61 Cr implies a net margin of about 23%.
• Dividend yield of 2.63% provides some current cash return from an asset-based trust.
• The trust maintains a measurable quarterly revenue base of ₹61 Cr, showing ongoing operating activity.
• Zero reported sales and profit growth means the base is not eroding in this snapshot.

Concerns

• P/E of 139.21 and ₹2,268 Cr market cap imply a very expensive valuation relative to reported earnings.
• Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 and ROCE of 0.00% indicate poor financial health and unproductive capital.
• No book value, debt/equity, promoter holding, or 52-week range data limits any asset or leverage assessment.
• Sales growth and profit growth of 0.00% provide no earnings engine to justify the price.

AI Analysis

Let me start with the basic maths. At ₹115, the market capitalisation is ₹2,268 Cr, and the P/E is 139.21. That means the market is paying an extraordinary premium for the reported earnings. The latest quarter shows sales of ₹61 Cr and a net profit of ₹14 Cr, which gives a net margin of about 23%. But even if I annualise that profit, the share is still roughly 40 times annualised earnings—too rich for a business with zero sales growth and zero profit growth. The Piotroski F-Score of 2 out of 9 is a serious red flag. It points to weak financial health, and the 0.00% ROCE reinforces that capital is not being turned into productive returns. I cannot find a durable moat in these numbers. There is no book value, no debt/equity, and no promoter holding data, so I cannot assess leverage or asset backing—two things Graham insisted on knowing. The dividend yield of 2.63% offers a small income cushion, but it is nowhere near enough to compensate for the valuation and the lack of growth. This is not a bargain. A stock can be cheap only if the facts support it; here the screen gives it a risky 0/100 score, so the odds are not in the investor's favour. It is a slow-growing, high-priced trust that fails the margin-of-safety test. For a retail investor, the risk is clear: you are paying too much for a business that is not compounding. I would leave this on the shelf and wait for a better price, better profitability, and better disclosures.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer