TTK Prestige (TTKPRESTIG)

Slow Grower

FairStock Score: 23/100 — RISKY

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹595.9
Market Cap₹8,161.83 Cr
P/E Ratio42.2
ROCE11.55%
ROE7.57%
Dividend Yield1.26%
Profit Growth123.2%
Debt/Equity0.09
Sales Growth33.6%
Promoter Holding70.52%
52-Week Range₹423 — ₹771.2
SectorConsumer Durables
Book Value₹144.57

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

I have always said that price is what you pay, value is what you get. At ₹520.05, TTK Prestige has a market cap of ₹7,158 Cr. That is not a small price for a company earning only a 7.57% ROE. In Graham's terms, a P/E of 46.65 and P/B of 3.80 demand exceptional future growth, but the latest quarter shows net profit of ₹32 Cr on sales of ₹801 Cr — a thin margin. Profit growth has already turned negative at -13.74%, while sales grew 10.20%. The PEG ratio of 4.57 tells me the market is paying up far more than the growth supports. The balance sheet is clean: debt/equity of 0.10, and promoters own 70.52%, which aligns interests. The brand in kitchen appliances likely has some consumer franchise, and ROCE of 11.55% is respectable. But a high-quality business must also generate strong returns on equity; 7.57% is mediocre. The Piotroski F-score of 4/9 suggests weakening fundamentals, and the FairStock score of 13/100 labels it risky. I am not excited by a dividend yield of 1.15% when I can wait for a better entry. The 52-week range of ₹423.00 to ₹771.20 shows volatility and perhaps a cooling of earlier optimism. If the business can stabilize profits and improve margins, it may deserve attention, but at 46.65 times earnings, there is no margin of safety. My approach is to buy wonderful businesses at fair prices, not merely good businesses at rich prices. Today, TTK Prestige tests my patience. I would keep it on my watchlist and wait for either a lower price or clear evidence of profit acceleration.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer