Teamo Production (TPHQ)
CyclicalScore breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹0.49 |
| Market Cap | ₹53.71 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 9.83 |
| ROCE | 3.99% |
| ROE | 4.77% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 809.68% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.01 |
| Sales Growth | 16.85% |
| Promoter Holding | 26.48% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹0.37 — ₹0.86 |
| Sector | Construction |
| Book Value | ₹1.31 |
Strengths
- Trades at 0.48 times book value, providing an asset cushion below ₹1.20 book value.
- Trailing P/E of 9.83 and headline profit growth of 989% make the stock optically inexpensive.
- Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 suggests reasonable recent improvement in fundamentals.
- Latest quarter delivered ₹5 Cr net profit on ₹18 Cr sales, showing possible margin recovery.
Concerns
- Sales declined by 9.67%, so the business is shrinking at the top line.
- ROE of 4.77% and ROCE of 3.99% signal a low-return, commodity-like construction business.
- Promoter holding of only 26.48% is weak for a small-cap company.
- No dividend means no income support while waiting for value to unlock.
AI Analysis
As a value investor, my first job is not to forecast but to assess quality and risk. Teamo Production does little to excite me on quality. It is a civil construction player with declining sales—down 9.67%—and returns of only 4.77% on equity and 3.99% on capital. Such numbers are characteristic of a price-taker in a commodity industry, not a business with a durable moat. The headline profit growth of 989% and a PEG of 0.01 are seductive but probably misleading; with revenue shrinking, this is not compounding from a healthy core. The price of ₹0.58 is below book value of ₹1.20, so the stock offers an asset cushion at 0.48 times book. A P/E of 9.83 on those earnings looks reasonable, and the latest quarter—₹18 Cr sales and ₹5 Cr net profit—suggests some recent vitality. The Piotroski score of 6/9 is decent, but it is not a clean bill of health, especially when promoter holding is just 26.48%. In small-cap construction, I like owners to have far more skin in the game. There is no dividend, so the investor must depend entirely on business performance. I would not call this a wonderful business; it is a mediocre cyclical that may be in an early turn. The market treats it as a cheap asset play, but cheap valuation is not a catalyst. If the latest quarter's margin is sustainable, or if revenue begins to grow, the stock could rerate. But as Graham would say, price is what you pay, value is what you get. Here the value is uncertain; I need more evidence of sustainable earnings and better capital allocation before committing.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer