Technocraf.Inds. (TIIL)

Cyclical

FairStock Score: 46/100 — MIXED

Score breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹3,088.7
Market Cap₹7,002.95 Cr
P/E Ratio24.57
ROCE15.77%
ROE17.89%
Dividend Yield1.3%
Profit Growth45.12%
Debt/Equity0.4
Sales Growth10.83%
Promoter Holding74.75%
52-Week Range₹1,868.5 — ₹3,565.3
SectorIndustrial Products
Book Value₹892.04

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

Technocraf presents an interesting paradox. On one hand, I see a business with a return on equity near 18% and a Piotroski score of 7, suggesting healthy fundamentals. The debt-to-equity ratio of 0.43 is manageable, and promoter holding at 74.75% aligns interests with minority shareholders. Yet the top line grew only 2.81%, while profits jumped 30.98%. That gap tells me the recent earnings surge is more about margin expansion or operational leverage than durable demand growth. In a cyclical steel products industry, such profit spikes can reverse quickly when prices turn. At ₹2,501, the stock trades at 18.77 times earnings and 4.25 times book value. For a slow-growing cyclical, that is not a margin of safety Graham would admire. The dividend yield is a paltry 0.88%, so income seekers won't be compensated while waiting. Book value of ₹589 provides a floor, but P/B of 4.25 means you are paying a hefty premium for that floor. The PEG ratio of 1.11 assumes the 30.98% profit growth is sustainable, but with sales growth of under 3%, that assumption is shaky. I'd rather wait for a cyclical downturn to buy a better business at 10-12 times earnings. The latest quarter's net profit of ₹54 Cr on sales of ₹662 Cr is decent, but I need to see whether this is a new normal or a cyclical peak. A FairStock score of 39/100 is a warning flag. As Buffett would say, it's far better to buy a wonderful company at a fair price, but Technocraf is neither wonderfully growing nor cheap. I'll keep it on my watchlist and wait.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer