Thomas Cook (I) (THOMASCOOK)

Cyclical

FairStock Score: 39/100 — MIXED

Score breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹105.88
Market Cap₹5,003.08 Cr
P/E Ratio22.62
ROCE18.69%
ROE6.09%
Dividend Yield0.47%
Profit Growth-0.6%
Debt/Equity0.21
Sales Growth-13.1%
Promoter Holding63.83%
52-Week Range₹86.35 — ₹180.2
SectorLeisure Services
Book Value₹54.67

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

At ₹99.74, Thomas Cook is priced at 19.19 times earnings, yet this is not a business with the economics I seek. Travel and tourism is inherently cyclical; the 52-week range from ₹86.35 to ₹181.55 tells me earnings and sentiment swing violently. Sales growth is modest at 4.11%, and the latest quarter's net margin is only about 2.1% (₹45 Cr profit on ₹2,146 Cr sales). That is a high-volume, low-margin operation, and it offers little pricing-power moat. Yes, promoter holding at 63.83% is reassuring, and debt/equity of 0.22 keeps the balance sheet conservative. ROCE of 18.69% looks decent, but the return to shareholders is weak: ROE is just 6.09%, and the dividend yield is only 0.44%. The Piotroski score of 7/9 suggests recent financial health is improving, but I cannot pay 19 times earnings for that. The PEG ratio of 1.59 indicates the 20.10% profit growth is already reflected in the price. Book value is ₹40.98, so paying ₹99.74 means over 2.4 times book—no margin of safety. If travel demand stumbles, profits could compress as quickly as they recovered. I would need a lower price, or evidence of durable growth and higher returns on equity, before treating Thomas Cook as a candidate. It's a cyclical play, not a compounder. In Buffett's words: be fearful when others are greedy. At this valuation, the market is not offering me a bargain; it is asking me to extrapolate a cyclical upturn.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer