Tata Inv.Corpn. (TATAINVEST)

Asset Play

FairStock Score: 18/100 — RISKY

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹667.3
Market Cap₹33,762.24 Cr
P/E Ratio78.14
ROCE1.21%
ROE1.31%
Dividend Yield0.51%
Profit Growth-1.8%
Debt/Equity0
Sales Growth4.1%
Free Cash Flow₹40 Cr
Promoter Holding73.38%
52-Week Range₹538.85 — ₹1,184.7
SectorFinance
Book Value₹577.55

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

Let me look at Tata Investment Corporation the way Graham would — not as an operating business, but as a wrapper of marketable securities. An investment company must be judged first on price against asset value. Today I pay ₹716.85 per share for book value of ₹614.50, roughly 1.17 times book. That is not a deep discount. The balance sheet is clean: zero debt, promoter holding of 73.38%, and a Piotroski F-score of 8/9. But the earnings engine is weak. ROE is just 1.31% and ROCE 1.21%. This is not a compounding machine; it is a passive vehicle dependent on Tata group equity values. Profit grew 21.72% and sales 8.11%, but at a P/E of 81.77 and EV/EBITDA of 93.87, the market is paying an extraordinary price for modest underlying returns. The Graham Number is ₹333.83, DCF intrinsic value ₹42.56, and PEG is 7.20. Even allowing for distortions in investment-company accounting, the margin of safety is deeply negative. Dividend yield of 0.41% will not compensate me for waiting. Altman Z-Score of 1.49 flashes caution, even if less relevant for a holding company. Free cash flow of ₹40 Cr is tiny against a ₹33,327 Cr market cap. In Buffett's words, price is what you pay, value is what you get. Here, I see no margin of safety — only dependence on market sentiment and Tata brand goodwill. A great name does not justify 82 times earnings. I would wait for a far lower price, perhaps near or below book value, before even a small speculative position. This is an asset play, not a wealth compounder.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer