Swastik Pipe (SWASTIK)

Cyclical

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹67.65
Market Cap₹157.16 Cr
P/E Ratio0
ROCE4.26%
ROE—%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth-899.13%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth-34.49%
Promoter Holding64.51%
52-Week Range₹12.5 — ₹67.65
SectorIndustrial Products

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

At first glance, ₹22.25 with a ₹39 Cr market cap looks like a distressed bargain. But I do not buy what I cannot value, and this is not value—it is a red flag. Swastik Pipe is a commodity iron and steel products business. In the latest quarter, it generated ₹240 Cr of sales yet lost ₹10 Cr at the net level. Annualise that sales figure and compare it to the market cap, and the revenue seems large, but a pipe maker with no margin is just moving metal for the banks. Sales growth is down 34.49%, and profit growth is -899.13%; that is not a temporary blip, it is destruction. ROCE is only 4.26%, well below what I would require for a cyclical commodity business. The Piotroski F-Score of 3 out of 9 tells me the financial condition is weak. P/E is quoted as 0.00 because earnings are negative, not because the stock is cheap. Worse, key figures like book value, ROE and debt/equity are not available. When the data is missing, I cannot calculate margin of safety. Promoter holding of 64.51% is encouraging—owners have skin in the game—but high ownership in a loss-making commodity business does not create a moat. There is no dividend, so the investor must rely entirely on price appreciation, which requires a genuine business turnaround. The 52-week range of ₹12.50 to ₹36.95 shows how volatile this paper has been. This is a cyclical iron and steel play in a severe downturn, maybe a future turnaround, but I need evidence of positive cash flow, reduced debt and margin recovery before committing capital. Price is what you pay; value is what you get. Here, I cannot see the value.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer