Sonam (SONAMLTD)
TurnaroundScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 1/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹55.38 |
| Market Cap | ₹221.7 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 30.26 |
| ROCE | 13.43% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 1.08% |
| Profit Growth | 127.3% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.3 |
| Sales Growth | 76% |
| Promoter Holding | 57.27% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹37.4 — ₹80 |
| Sector | Consumer Durables |
| Book Value | ₹17.86 |
Strengths
- Sales growth of 50.79% and latest quarter revenue of ₹38 crore show strong demand traction.
- Debt/equity of 0.30 is conservative and provides financial stability.
- Piotroski F-score of 7/9 suggests improving fundamentals on multiple dimensions.
- Promoter holding of 57.27% aligns management interest with shareholders.
- ROCE of 13.43% is acceptable for a small-cap electronics company.
Concerns
- Profit growth of just 3.77% against 50.79% sales growth indicates severe margin compression.
- Valuation is rich: P/E of 32.33 and P/B of 3.28, with zero dividend yield.
- Latest quarter net profit of ₹2 crore on ₹38 crore of sales is thin; annualised profit does not comfortably support the ₹198 crore market cap.
- A PEG based on profit growth would be far above 1, making the stock expensive on actual earnings.
AI Analysis
At ₹54.53, Sonam is only a ₹198 crore market cap. I prefer smaller businesses when they are cheap, but this one is not. Sales grew 50.79%, which is impressive at first glance, yet profit rose only 3.77%. That is the first warning flag: the top line is racing while the bottom line is crawling. The latest quarter shows ₹38 crore in sales and ₹2 crore in net profit—a margin barely above 5%. Annualised, that is roughly ₹8 crore, so even on that basis the stock trades at about 25 times forward profit, and the trailing P/E of 32.33 is far from Graham's bargain territory. Book value of ₹16.65 versus a share price of ₹54.53 means I am paying 3.28 times book, and with a zero dividend yield, I am relying entirely on future price appreciation. There is no obvious moat here; if there were, profit growth would not lag sales so badly. The balance sheet does offer some comfort: debt/equity is only 0.30, ROCE is 13.43%, and the Piotroski F-score of 7/9 points to improving fundamentals. Promoter holding of 57.27% aligns interests, though it also leaves little room for minority voice. The PEG of 1.19 seems to be based on the 50% sales growth; if I use actual profit growth of 3.77%, the PEG is much higher. This has the look of a turnaround in progress—sales momentum has arrived, but profitability hasn't. A patient investor should wait for margin expansion and profit acceleration. I won't pay 32 times earnings for hope.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer