Simbhaoli Sugar (SIMBHALS)

Cyclical

Score breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹6.94
Market Cap₹29.45 Cr
P/E Ratio3.28
ROCE3.23%
ROE-11.68%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth-93.3%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth-42%
Free Cash Flow₹1,03,73,093.76 Cr
Promoter Holding53.33%
52-Week Range₹6.35 — ₹14.95
SectorAgricultural Food & other Products
Book Value₹-42.73

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

At ₹10.19, Simbhaoli Sugar has a tiny ₹35 Cr market cap and a tempting P/E of 3.28. But Graham taught me that a low multiple is only meaningful if the business has solid assets and earning power. Here the balance sheet is the first red flag: book value is negative, ₹-30.32 per share, so debt has swallowed equity. ROE is -11.68% and the latest quarter lost ₹5 Cr on ₹203 Cr of sales. This is not a compounding machine; it is a commodity sugar producer with pricing power limited by cyclical sugar prices and government regulation. Sales fell 8.1% and profit fell 70.3%, and the Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 confirms fundamental deterioration. A zero dividend is no compensation while waiting. Yes, ROCE is positive at 3.23%, but that is far below what a shareholder should earn, especially with negative book value; debt/equity is not even computable, which itself tells you the solvency risk. The 52-week range of ₹6.35 to ₹15.99 shows how speculative and volatile this stock can be. A reported free cash flow of ₹103.73 lakh Cr, if accurate, is the one encouraging sign, but with continuing losses and negative equity, I would need to see cash generation sustained and debt reduced. Promoter holding of 53.33% is useful but does not protect minority shareholders from value destruction. This is not a wonderful business at a fair price; it is a troubled cyclical with leverage. There is no margin of safety when the enterprise itself is financially weak. I will pass until there is clear evidence of a turnaround and a repaired balance sheet.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer