Simbhaoli Sugar (SIMBHALS)
CyclicalScore breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹6.94 |
| Market Cap | ₹29.45 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 3.28 |
| ROCE | 3.23% |
| ROE | -11.68% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | -93.3% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | -42% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹1,03,73,093.76 Cr |
| Promoter Holding | 53.33% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹6.35 — ₹14.95 |
| Sector | Agricultural Food & other Products |
| Book Value | ₹-42.73 |
Strengths
- Promoter holding at 53.33% provides some alignment, though it is no substitute for sound fundamentals.
- Reported positive free cash flow (₹103.73 lakh Cr) could imply some cash generation, if the data is reliable.
- Latest quarter revenue of ₹203 Cr provides a sizeable operating base relative to the ₹35 Cr market cap, leaving room for operating leverage if margins recover.
- ROCE is positive at 3.23%, indicating operations are not entirely value-destructive at the operating level, despite negative ROE.
Concerns
- Negative book value of ₹-30.32 per share and non-computable Debt/Equity; liabilities exceed assets and solvency is a clear risk.
- Latest quarter net loss of ₹-5 Cr, with profit growth down 70.3% and sales down 8.1%; momentum is negative.
- ROE at -11.68% and Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 indicate poor capital allocation and deteriorating financial health.
- Zero dividend and P/E of 3.28 are misleading because earnings quality is weak and book value is negative.
AI Analysis
At ₹10.19, Simbhaoli Sugar has a tiny ₹35 Cr market cap and a tempting P/E of 3.28. But Graham taught me that a low multiple is only meaningful if the business has solid assets and earning power. Here the balance sheet is the first red flag: book value is negative, ₹-30.32 per share, so debt has swallowed equity. ROE is -11.68% and the latest quarter lost ₹5 Cr on ₹203 Cr of sales. This is not a compounding machine; it is a commodity sugar producer with pricing power limited by cyclical sugar prices and government regulation. Sales fell 8.1% and profit fell 70.3%, and the Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 confirms fundamental deterioration. A zero dividend is no compensation while waiting. Yes, ROCE is positive at 3.23%, but that is far below what a shareholder should earn, especially with negative book value; debt/equity is not even computable, which itself tells you the solvency risk. The 52-week range of ₹6.35 to ₹15.99 shows how speculative and volatile this stock can be. A reported free cash flow of ₹103.73 lakh Cr, if accurate, is the one encouraging sign, but with continuing losses and negative equity, I would need to see cash generation sustained and debt reduced. Promoter holding of 53.33% is useful but does not protect minority shareholders from value destruction. This is not a wonderful business at a fair price; it is a troubled cyclical with leverage. There is no margin of safety when the enterprise itself is financially weak. I will pass until there is clear evidence of a turnaround and a repaired balance sheet.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer