Shah Alloys (SHAHALLOYS)
CyclicalScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹72.11 |
| Market Cap | ₹142.76 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 1.33 |
| ROCE | -25.75% |
| ROE | 205.84% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 345.83% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.56 |
| Sales Growth | -98.7% |
| Promoter Holding | 53.75% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹53.1 — ₹116.85 |
| Sector | Industrial Products |
| Book Value | ₹56.78 |
Strengths
- Promoter holding of 53.75% aligns majority owners with public shareholders.
- Reported net profit of ₹38 Cr in the latest quarter and profit growth of 345.83% show some earnings momentum, though quality needs scrutiny.
- Book value per share of ₹37.73 and P/B of 1.85 mean the stock is not at an extreme asset multiple.
- Piotroski F-score of 5/9 suggests some positive financial signals, albeit modest.
Concerns
- Sales fell 79.65%; latest quarterly revenue of ₹11 Cr is minuscule for a steel company.
- ROCE of -25.75% indicates core operations are destroying capital, not creating value.
- P/E of 0.00 and Debt/Equity N/A make standard valuation and leverage checks impossible; data is insufficient.
- Zero dividend means minority shareholders receive no cash return while the business is shrinking.
AI Analysis
Shah Alloys is the kind of confusing picture that makes a value investor turn wary. A steel company with sales down 79.65% and latest quarterly revenue of only ₹11 Cr cannot be called a growing business. Yet it reports a net profit of ₹38 Cr and profit growth of 345.83%. The stated P/E of 0.00 is meaningless. In Graham's language, when profits appear while the core business shrinks, I must ask: from where? The negative ROCE of -25.75% tells me that operations are not earning their cost of capital. The 66.08% ROE is arithmetic flattery on a book value of ₹37.73, not evidence of a moat. Iron and steel is a capital-intensive, commoditised industry; I see no pricing power here. Debt/equity is N/A, so I cannot assess leverage. The Piotroski F-score of 5/9 is mediocre, not a clean bill of health. At a price of ₹69.65, the market cap is ₹130 Cr and the stock trades at 1.85 times book value. That is a premium for a business whose capital returns are negative. There is no dividend. Promoters holding 53.75% is a point in favour, but ownership alone does not create intrinsic value. The 52-week range of ₹53.10 to ₹83.85 shows a volatile, uncertain situation. FairStock itself says insufficient data. I would need to understand whether the ₹38 Cr profit is repeatable operating earnings or a one-off. Until sales stabilise, debt is disclosed, and ROCE turns positive, this is a cyclical speculation, not a compounder. Benjamin Graham would demand a margin of safety; at 1.85 times book with negative ROCE, I cannot find one. In steel, cycles turn, but I want to see the turn in operating numbers first.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer