Setubandhan Inf. (SETUINFRA)

Asset Play

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹0.42
Market Cap₹5.41 Cr
P/E Ratio42
ROCE0.39%
ROE0.21%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth0%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth0%
Promoter Holding27.42%
52-Week Range₹0.37 — ₹0.77
SectorConstruction
Book Value₹3.94

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

At ₹0.62, Setubandhan Inf. carries a market cap of only ₹5 Cr, while the stated book value stands at ₹3.94 per share. That gives a price-to-book of 0.16 — the market is ascribing just 16 paise for every rupee of net worth. Benjamin Graham taught me to look at such deep discounts with interest, but he also taught me to measure the quality of the asset behind the number. This is a civil construction company that has reported zero sales in the latest quarter and sales growth of -100%. Profit growth is -161.04%, and there is no meaningful P/E because earnings are absent. ROE at 0.21% and ROCE at 0.39% tell me the capital employed is barely breathing, far below any acceptable return. With a Piotroski F-Score of 3/9, the financial signals are weak; this is not a company getting fundamentally stronger. I also see promoter holding of only 27.42%, which does not give me great confidence in owner-operator alignment. The debt/equity is N/A, so I cannot verify leverage from the given data; that is another reason to be cautious, because debt could erode the book value I am supposedly buying at a discount. The 52-week range of ₹0.37 to ₹0.78 shows a stock trading like a penny shell, not a growing franchise. This is not a wonderful business with a moat; it is a potential asset play, and only if the book value is real, recoverable and unencumbered. As an investor, I prefer a good business at a reasonable price over a dying business at a cheap price. Without a visible path to revenue or asset realisation, the low price may simply be fair compensation for risk.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer