Sawaliya Food (SAWALIYA)
Slow GrowerScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 2/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹301.15 |
| Market Cap | ₹305.93 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 43.96 |
| ROCE | 44.37% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 0% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 0% |
| Promoter Holding | 67.78% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹142.2 — ₹351 |
| Sector | Agricultural Food & other Products |
Strengths
- High promoter holding of 67.78% aligns management with minority shareholders
- ROCE of 44.37% indicates efficient use of capital, if sustainable
- Latest quarter sales of ₹20 Cr and net profit of ₹4 Cr reflect a healthy 20% net margin
- Simple agricultural products business conceptually within a value investor's circle of competence
Concerns
- P/E of 43.96 is expensive for zero sales and profit growth
- Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 suggests weak fundamental health
- No dividend yield offers no compensation while waiting for value to emerge
- Missing data on book value, ROE, and debt/equity prevents a thorough balance sheet assessment
AI Analysis
When I look at Sawaliya Food, I see a business I want to understand but cannot fully embrace at this price. The P/E of 43.96 against sales and profit growth of exactly 0.00% is a red flag. Benjamin Graham taught me to buy a rupee of value for 50 paise, but here I am being asked to pay nearly 44 times earnings for a company that is not growing. The lack of book value, ROE, and debt-to-equity data makes a thorough Graham-style analysis impossible. I cannot compute a margin of safety without the balance sheet. The ROCE of 44.37% is impressive on its face, but I must wonder if it is sustainable or a function of a very small capital base. The latest quarter shows sales of ₹20 Cr and net profit of ₹4 Cr, implying a 20% margin—that is a decent quarterly result, but one quarter is not a trend. The Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 is troubling; it suggests poor fundamental health, with likely weak profitability, leverage, or efficiency signals. On the positive side, promoter holding at 67.78% aligns interests with minority shareholders, and the company is in the agricultural products space—something I can roughly understand. But a zero dividend yield offers no income support, and with the stock in the middle of its 52-week range of ₹265.05 to ₹351.00, there is no obvious bargain. This is not a business I would buy without a far lower price, or clear evidence that growth and profitability are genuinely inflecting upward. As a value investor, I prefer uncertain business at a certain discount, not a certain business at an uncertain price.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer