Saatvik Green (SAATVIKGL)

Fast Grower

FairStock Score: 55/100 — STEADY

Score breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 2/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹427.4
Market Cap₹5,432.47 Cr
P/E Ratio14.37
ROCE52.33%
ROE42.05%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth-38%
Debt/Equity0.69
Sales Growth74.9%
Promoter Holding75.99%
52-Week Range₹328 — ₹567
SectorElectrical Equipment
Book Value₹113.63

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

Let me look at Saatvik Green not as a ticker but as a business. The first thing that catches my eye is the combination of price and growth: I can buy a stake at ₹467.25, or about 11.9 times earnings, while profits grew 144% and sales grew 142.6%. That implies a PEG ratio of 0.08, which is unusually cheap if the growth is durable. Graham would say price is what you pay, value is what you get; here the market is paying what appears to be a modest multiple for a business earning a 52.33% ROCE. That level of return on capital, with debt/equity only 0.47, suggests a competitive position and financial discipline. Promoters own 75.99%, so their interests are aligned with mine. The Piotroski F-score of 7 out of 9 also points to improving financial health. But I must be careful. The latest quarter's sales of ₹1,257 Cr and profit of ₹99 Cr are strong, but one quarter does not make a permanent franchise. The book value is only ₹106.95, so I'm paying 4.37 times book for the business, not a margin of safety in asset terms. There is no dividend; I am relying entirely on management to reinvest for me. And ROE is not even reported here, so I cannot fully judge how much shareholder equity is earning. I would call this a fast grower, not a stalwart; I need to see whether this growth is repeatable and what happens when the industry inevitably cools. FairStock's 55/100 'steady' score reminds me to temper my enthusiasm. If growth sustains, the current P/E is attractive. If not, the high book multiple will hurt.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer