Rudra Global (RUDRA)
CyclicalScore breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹22.46 |
| Market Cap | ₹225.37 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 16.64 |
| ROCE | 12.25% |
| ROE | 10.26% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | -5.1% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.97 |
| Sales Growth | 6.6% |
| Promoter Holding | 72.88% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹14.63 — ₹29.7 |
| Sector | Industrial Products |
| Book Value | ₹13.29 |
Strengths
- Profit growth of 367.09% and Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 indicate improving financial health and operating efficiency.
- ROE of 11.08% and ROCE of 12.25% are acceptable returns for a capital-intensive steel business.
- Promoter holding of 72.88% aligns management's interests with minority shareholders.
- P/E of 14.54 and P/B of 1.88 are not excessive on current reported earnings and book value.
- Latest quarter sales of ₹159 Cr and net profit of ₹7 Cr show ongoing operating traction.
Concerns
- Debt/equity of 1.75 is high, and zero dividend means cash flow must first service debt and fund capex.
- Sales growth of only 6.88% versus profit growth of 367.09% suggests low-base cyclical margin expansion, not durable compounding.
- Iron and steel is a commodity business with limited pricing power; margins can reverse quickly when steel prices turn.
- P/B of 1.88 offers limited margin of safety in a cyclical operating at a mid-range 52-week price of ₹22.35.
AI Analysis
Let's look at Rudra Global as a business, not a ticker. It is an iron and steel products company operating in a deeply cyclical, commodity-like industry. The first thing I see is a promoter holding of 72.88%, which aligns ownership with minority shareholders, but it also means we must rely on their capital allocation in a capital-intensive sector. The balance sheet is not comfortable: debt/equity of 1.75 is high for my taste, and with zero dividend, the investor's return depends entirely on reinvestment and eventual price realization. ROE of 11.08% and ROCE of 12.25% are acceptable but not evidence of an economic moat. In a commoditized steel business, these returns can evaporate when prices turn. The 367.09% profit growth looks spectacular, but sales only grew 6.88%, so this is margin expansion on a low base—classic cyclical upturn, not durable compounding. The reported P/E of 14.54 is not expensive if earnings are maintainable, but steel earnings are rarely maintainable. Book value of ₹11.91 against price ₹22.35 gives P/B of 1.88; I would demand a margin of safety before paying nearly twice book in a cyclical. The Piotroski F-Score of 7 suggests recent financial health, but that is a point-in-time snapshot. I cannot call this a wonderful business. It may be a decent cyclical opportunity if steel prices hold and debt comes down, but I need margin of safety and evidence of conservative management.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer