Rama Telecom (RTL)
Fast GrowerScore breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 2/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹84.45 |
| Market Cap | ₹112.99 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 18.74 |
| ROCE | 44.56% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 26.04% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 21.65% |
| Promoter Holding | 71.28% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹70.4 — ₹100.9 |
| Sector | Telecom - Services |
Strengths
- ROCE of 44.56% indicates highly efficient capital deployment.
- Sales growth of 21.65% and profit growth of 26.04% show accelerating profitability.
- Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 suggests solid recent fundamentals.
- Promoter holding of 71.28% aligns owner and management interests.
- PEG of 0.79 offers growth at a reasonable valuation.
Concerns
- Zero dividend yield means no income support for minority shareholders.
- Missing book value, ROE and debt/equity data prevent a full balance-sheet risk assessment.
- Latest quarter net profit of ₹2 Cr on ₹22 Cr sales is a thin margin, leaving little room for shocks.
- Small market cap of ₹113 Cr and a wide 52-week range suggest volatility and possibly low liquidity.
AI Analysis
Rama Telecom looks like an interesting small-cap, but I must be honest: I don't like buying what I can't fully measure. The figures I do see are mixed. A return on capital employed of 44.56% is genuinely impressive; in my experience, that kind of number suggests a business that does not need huge additional capital to grow. Sales are up 21.65% and profit up 26.04%, so profit is outpacing revenue. With a P/E of 18.74 and PEG of 0.79, the market seems to be pricing growth without going overboard. A Piotroski score of 7 out of 9 also reassures me that the fundamentals are not deteriorating. But there are serious gaps. I have no book value, no ROE, and no debt/equity ratio. How can I judge the balance-sheet risk if I don't know how much leverage sits underneath? The latest quarter shows ₹22 Cr in sales and ₹2 Cr in net profit, a thin margin; at an annualised level, that would not leave much room for error. The zero dividend yield is also not attractive to me: as a minority shareholder in a ₹113 Cr company, I want some cash returned or at least visible reinvestment at high ROE. The promoter holding of 71.28% is good in principle, but it also means small shareholders have little say. Is it a fast grower? The numbers support that label: high ROCE, double-digit growth, reasonable valuation. But Buffett has taught me that a good business and a good investment are different. I would put this on my watchlist and wait for the missing financials before taking a position. Let the story be proven with more numbers, and I will happily revisit.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer