RPG LifeScience. (RPGLIFE)

Slow Grower

FairStock Score: 25/100 — RISKY

Score breakdown: P/E: 1/3 · ROCE: 2/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹2,782.3
Market Cap₹4,601.65 Cr
P/E Ratio38.46
ROCE32.8%
ROE53.41%
Dividend Yield0.86%
Profit Growth16.28%
Debt/Equity0.03
Sales Growth14.76%
Promoter Holding72.95%
52-Week Range₹1,733 — ₹3,082
SectorPharmaceuticals & Biotechnology
Book Value₹366.01

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

At ₹2,011.40, RPG LifeScience wears a market cap of ₹3,100 crore. The first numbers that jump out are a 53.41% ROE and a 32.80% ROCE. In Graham's language, those are unusually high returns on capital—often a sign of a good business. But my job is not to fall in love with ratios; it is to estimate future earnings. Sales grew only 4.24%, while profit fell 18.32%. That combination tells me the business is not compounding. The latest quarter's ₹180 crore sales and ₹22 crore net profit are respectable on an annualised basis, but the trend is against the shareholder. At a P/E of 29.51 and a PEG of 6.96, the market is paying a premium for no growth. Graham would call that speculation. Book value is just ₹230.74; at ₹2,011.40 I am paying 8.72 times book for a company whose earnings are declining. The Piotroski score of 4/9 reinforces the weak fundamental trend, and FairStock's 18/100 risk score matches my caution. On the positive side, promoter holding of 72.95% provides alignment, and the dividend yield of 1.07% gives a small return while I wait. The D/E is not shown, so I cannot give unqualified praise to the balance sheet. In a pharmaceutical market, moats can exist, but these figures do not prove a durable moat to me. This is a slow grower with high historical returns and a demanding valuation. I would need to see sales growth accelerate and profits turn positive before I deploy capital. Price is what you pay; value is what you get. Here, the value is not visible.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer