Rhetan TMT Ltd (RHETAN)

Cyclical

FairStock Score: 20/100 — RISKY

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹21.05
Market Cap₹1,677.42 Cr
P/E Ratio161.92
ROCE4.47%
ROE10.17%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth220.14%
Debt/Equity0.38
Sales Growth30.8%
Promoter Holding62.12%
52-Week Range₹19.1 — ₹34.87
SectorIndustrial Products
Book Value₹3.92

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

Rhetan TMT fails my first test: a margin of safety. At ₹28.71, the market cap is ₹2,073 Cr, but the book value is only ₹1.13 per share — so I am paying 25.4 times tangible net worth. The reported profit growth of 220.14% grabs attention, but the latest quarter undermines it: sales of ₹6 Cr produced net profit of ₹4 Cr, a 67% net margin. No ordinary steel company wins that consistently, and with annual sales contraction of 3.61%, this looks more like a spike than a franchise. Trailing P/E of 242.13 means the market is paying for years of flawless execution; any disappointment could cause severe value erosion. ROE of 9.30% and ROCE of 4.47% are far below what a ₹2,000 Cr business should produce. Debt/equity of 0.42 is manageable, and Piotroski F-score 6/9 is not terrible, but these do not offset valuation risk. There is no dividend yield, so the only return is speculative price appreciation. Promoter holding of 62.12% is healthy, but ownership alone does not protect an overpriced share. Steel is cyclical; current profits may be near a favourable phase, and margins can revert quickly. In Graham's language, price is what you pay, value is what you get. At 242 times earnings, with sales shrinking, I do not see value. The FairStock Score of 14/100 labels it risky, and I agree. I would keep Rhetan on the sidelines until the price falls to a rational multiple of earnings and book value, or until the company demonstrates durable high returns on capital. In investing, patience and discipline beat excitement.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer