Ramdevbaba Sol. (RBS)
CyclicalScore breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹93 |
| Market Cap | ₹212.61 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 13.85 |
| ROCE | 7.9% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | -17.87% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | -4.01% |
| Promoter Holding | 62.61% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹58.8 — ₹132 |
| Sector | Agricultural Food & other Products |
Strengths
- Promoter holding at 62.61% aligns ownership with minority shareholders
- P/E of 13.85 is not demanding if earnings stabilize, but that is a big if
- Quarterly sales of ₹386 Cr give the company a meaningful operating scale
- Current price is well above the 52-week low of ₹58.80, showing some market demand or recovery expectation
Concerns
- Sales growth of -4.01% and profit growth of -17.87% show deteriorating fundamentals
- Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 suggests weak financial health and poor operating/balance-sheet indicators
- ROCE of only 7.90% reflects mediocre returns on capital
- Latest quarter net margin is thin (~1.5% from ₹6 Cr profit on ₹386 Cr sales), leaving little room for error
AI Analysis
At ₹105, Ramdevbaba Sol. wears a mask of cheapness with a P/E of 13.85, but I have learned that a low multiple is only interesting when the business underneath is sound. This is an edible-oil company—a commodity processor, not a brand with pricing power. Recent numbers confirm the strain: sales have fallen 4%, profits are down nearly 18%, and the latest quarter’s net margin is a wafer-thin 6/386, around 1.5%. The Piotroski F-score of 3/9 is a red flag; it tells me the balance sheet and operating efficiency are deteriorating, not improving. A 7.9% ROCE is barely acceptable; in a competitive, input-cost-sensitive industry, I want much higher returns on capital to compensate for risk. Promoter holding at 62.61% is one positive—owner-operators with skin in the game—but high holding also means minority investors need careful governance. There is no dividend, so my return depends entirely on the business earning a better return on capital. With sales and profits shrinking, this looks like a cyclical trough, or possibly a declining slow grower. The stock has already risen from ₹58.80 to ₹105.05, so the easy rebound may be priced in. I cannot value it with confidence without book value and debt details. In Graham’s language, this is not a defensive stock; it is a speculative vehicle for those who believe edible-oil margins will recover. I would rather wait for a margin of safety: improved ROCE, stable profit growth, or a lower price. For now, I pass.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer