Prec. Wires (I) (PRECWIRE)

Cyclical

FairStock Score: 43/100 — MIXED

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 2/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹458.35
Market Cap₹8,379 Cr
P/E Ratio47.84
ROCE26.78%
ROE24.07%
Dividend Yield0.38%
Profit Growth67.1%
Debt/Equity0.39
Sales Growth60.4%
Promoter Holding56.62%
52-Week Range₹178.8 — ₹524.9
SectorIndustrial Products
Book Value₹42.25

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

When I look at Precision Wires, the first thing I see is a profitable business, not a bargain. Returns on capital are excellent: ROE 24.07%, ROCE 26.78%, and debt-equity only 0.19. Promoters own 56.62%, so their interests are aligned with mine. The growth numbers are striking—sales up 37.19% and profits up 98.94%—and the Piotroski score of 7/9 suggests the earnings quality is reasonable. At 43.92 times earnings and 13.48 times book, however, Mr. Market is paying for continued perfection. Book value is just ₹29.10; the price is ₹392.25. A dividend yield of 0.37% means I'm not being paid to wait. What bothers me is the nature of the business. This is aluminium, copper, and zinc products—a commodity-linked wire maker. The latest quarter shows ₹1,348 Cr in sales but only ₹38 Cr in net profit, a margin of about 2.8%. That is thin, and in commodity inputs, fat profits often invite competition and price erosion. A 98.94% profit jump may reflect a favourable cycle, not a durable moat. Graham would ask: can earnings be sustained? If yes, the PEG of 0.65 makes the price interesting. If no, a P/E of 43.92 is a trap. I would classify this as a cyclical, not a stalwart. The market is treating it like a fast grower, and the balance sheet is sound, but the price leaves little room for error. I need to see several quarters of this growth with stable margins before I trust it. In investing, you pay a good price for a good business; here I'm being asked to pay an excellent price for a good business—and that's not my game.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer