Prakash Industri (PRAKASH)

Cyclical

FairStock Score: 30/100 — RISKY

Score breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 1/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹137.68
Market Cap₹2,465.6 Cr
P/E Ratio7.4
ROCE11.24%
ROE10.43%
Dividend Yield1.09%
Profit Growth-22%
Debt/Equity0.14
Sales Growth-0.5%
Promoter Holding44.38%
52-Week Range₹110.24 — ₹177
SectorFerrous Metals
Book Value₹200.38

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

At 140 rupees, Prakash Industri sells at a meaningful discount to book value of 177.69 rupees. That catches any Graham investor's attention. But price isn't the whole story. This is an iron and steel business—a cyclical, capital-intensive commodity. No enduring consumer franchise, no pricing power. During good times it earns decent returns: ROE is 10.43%, ROCE is 11.24%, and debt-to-equity is just 0.10. That low leverage pleases me. The latest quarter net profit of 87 crore on sales of 799 crore suggests operations can generate cash even when steel conditions are not strong. However, sales fell 13.76%. That tells me we are likely in a down part of the cycle. Profit growth of 3.71% on declining revenue is unusual; I do not expect that to persist if prices stay weak. The P/E of 7.10 looks cheap, but cheap commodity companies can become cheaper. The P/B of 0.79 provides a cushion; book value is real if management is honest and plants are maintained. The Piotroski score of 6/9 is okay, not great. I would not call this a stalwart. It is a cyclical trading at an attractive valuation with a sound balance sheet. In true Graham style, I want margin of safety—here we have low debt, book value cover, and a modest dividend yield of 1.14%. But I must watch steel prices and whether the sales decline resumes. If the cycle turns up, low leverage and controlled costs could let profits surprise. If the downcycle deepens, book value might erode. I am interested—but I would size it cautiously and monitor quarterly trends.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer