Plada Infotech S (PLADAINFO)

Slow Grower

Score breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 1/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹30.05
Market Cap₹25.76 Cr
P/E Ratio5.39
ROCE10.69%
ROE—%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth6.74%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth6.96%
Promoter Holding62.64%
52-Week Range₹9.05 — ₹30.05
SectorCommercial Services & Supplies

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

Let me apply the same lens I would use for any investment. Plada Infotech is a tiny, understandable BPO/KPO operator, but a small firm in this industry generally lacks a durable competitive edge. Clients can squeeze pricing, and switching costs are often low. The numbers show a mixed picture. At ₹11.25, the market cap is only ₹10 Cr and the P/E is 5.39, implying an earnings yield of roughly 18.5%. That looks cheap, but value is not simply a low multiple; it must be anchored by dependable earnings. Revenue grew 6.96% and profit grew 6.74% — steady, modest, not exciting. The PEG of 0.79 tells me the market is paying less than the growth rate, which is supportive but only if the growth is durable. Latest quarter sales of ₹35 Cr generated just ₹1 Cr profit, a very thin net margin of about 2.9%. A company with this operating leverage can see profits swing sharply if clients reduce orders. On the positive side, the Piotroski F-score is 7/9, suggesting decent financial health, and promoter holding of 62.64% is reassuring. ROCE of 10.69% is acceptable but not a wonderful business. However, I am bothered by missing data: no book value, no ROE, no debt-equity ratio. Graham would refuse to rely on a single year's earnings without knowing the balance sheet strength. There is also no dividend, so the investor must wait indefinitely for price appreciation. The share trades near the lower end of its 52-week range, down from ₹20.30; I need to understand why before calling it a bargain. This is a slow grower with a possible margin-of-safety, but not a clear one.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer