Pelatro (PELATRO)

Fast Grower

Score breakdown: P/E: 1/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹304
Market Cap₹315.8 Cr
P/E Ratio22.46
ROCE22.43%
ROE—%
Dividend Yield0.34%
Profit Growth62.46%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth69.15%
Promoter Holding52.62%
52-Week Range₹246 — ₹400
SectorMedia

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

At first glance, Pelatro looks like the kind of small-cap growth story that makes value investors pause. Sales grew 69% and profit 62%, and at ₹304 the market capitalisation is only ₹316 Cr. That puts the trailing P/E at 22.46, which is not unreasonable for that pace of expansion; with a PEG of 0.34, the market seems to be pricing in much lower growth than the company has actually delivered. ROCE of 22.43% is genuinely good, and a Piotroski F-score of 7/9 suggests the financial statements are not deteriorating. Promoters owning 52.62% also aligns their interests with mine. But Graham would remind me that a wonderful growth rate is not the same as a wonderful business. I have no information on book value, return on equity, or debt-to-equity. That lack of balance-sheet transparency bothers me. The latest quarter shows sales of ₹38 Cr and net profit of ₹4 Cr - a margin of about 10.5%, which is decent but not spectacular. And with a market cap of ₹316 Cr, this is still a relatively small company. A single large client loss or a stumble in execution could hit the stock hard. The 52-week range of ₹246 to ₹325 shows the market itself has not yet decided what it is worth. I would not call this a deep-value Graham special. I would call it a fast grower with some attractive characteristics. The low PEG, healthy ROCE, and strong promoter holding make it worth watching. But I want more data: cash flow, debt, margins, client concentration, and a longer track record. Without those, I cannot measure the durability of the moat. I will keep it on my watchlist, not in my portfolio.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer