Parampara Dairy (PARAMPARA)
Fast GrowerScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹11 |
| Market Cap | ₹11.24 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 59.16 |
| ROCE | 1.05% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 50% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 23.74% |
| Promoter Holding | 1.46% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹10.45 — ₹12.95 |
| Sector | Industrial Products |
Strengths
- Sales growth of 23.74% shows the packaging business is expanding its topline at a healthy clip.
- Profit growth of 50% outpacing sales growth suggests some improving margin or cost control, albeit from a small base.
- Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 indicates recent financial health is not deteriorating on the metrics available.
- Quarterly sales of ₹10 Cr against an ₹11 Cr market cap shows the business has a real operational scale, even if profits are negligible.
Concerns
- Promoter holding of only 1.46% is a severe governance red flag and shows almost no skin in the game.
- ROCE of just 1.05% and latest-quarter net profit of ₹0 Cr indicate very poor returns on capital and unreliable earnings.
- P/E of 59.16 with a PEG of 1.60 offers no margin of safety at this price.
- No dividend, no book value, and no debt-equity data leave asset quality and shareholder returns largely undisclosed.
AI Analysis
Let me be blunt: at ₹11 a share, Parampara Dairy has the surface of a growth story but not the substance I look for. Sales grew 23.74% and profits 50%, but when the latest quarter delivers ₹10 crore of revenue and essentially zero net profit, those growth rates are flattering a tiny base. Market cap is just ₹11 crore; P/E is 59.16, and PEG 1.60. That is not a margin of safety. ROCE of 1.05% tells me the business is earning very little on the capital employed. A packaging company with this return profile is a capital guzzler, not a compounding machine. Promoter holding is only 1.46% — that alone disqualifies it for me. I cannot trust management that has almost no ownership and does not pay a dividend. Piotroski F-score of 7/9 suggests recent financials are not deteriorating, but Graham would remind me that a few good signals cannot replace a durable moat. There is no meaningful competitive advantage visible; in packaging, scale and efficiency rule, and this company's profitability suggests it has neither. At 52-week range of ₹10.45-₹12.95, the stock is near the low end, but a low price is not automatically cheap. Without book value or debt-equity data, I lack the margin-of-safety analysis I require. I would classify this as a fast grower on paper, but a fragile one. In India's small-cap market, a 1.46% promoter stake is an enormous governance red flag. I will watch from the sidelines until there is evidence of real profitability, improved returns on capital, and serious insider ownership.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer