Pace Digitek (PACEDIGITK)

Stalwart

FairStock Score: 55/100 — STEADY

Score breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 2/2 · Growth: 1/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹180.92
Market Cap₹3,905.18 Cr
P/E Ratio12.82
ROCE41.31%
ROE—%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth-6.3%
Debt/Equity0.44
Sales Growth51.3%
Promoter Holding69.52%
52-Week Range₹139.81 — ₹231.95
SectorTelecom - Services
Book Value₹112.19

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

This advertisement resembles a decent business, but my task is to find an attractive business at a sensible price. Pace Digitek earns a return on capital employed of 41.31%, a figure Graham and Buffett would admire, and it carries only 0.11 debt-to-equity, so the balance sheet does not keep me awake at night. Promoters own 69.52%, aligned with public shareholders, and the Piotroski score of 7 out of 9 suggests acceptable financial health. Yet I must be careful. The company reports 13.54% growth in sales but only 8.06% growth in profit. That divergence is a yellow flag: either costs are rising, pricing is weakening, or some non-operating item is interfering. In the latest quarter, sales were ₹644 Cr and net profit ₹79 Cr, so margins are visible, but I still do not see reported ROE, which reduces my confidence in the quality of disclosures. No dividend is paid, so my return depends entirely on the price rising with the business. At ₹176.45, the P/E is 14.73 and PEG is 1.36. That is not a distressed price; it is a fair price for a growing, high-return telecom infrastructure company. A Graham disciple demanding a margin of safety might wait for a lower multiple or for profit growth to restore conviction. P/B of 2.44 means I am paying a big premium over book value, though the 41.31% ROCE can justify some premium if sustained. FairStock Score of 51/100 reminds me this is mixed, not obviously compelling. I would keep it in the research nest, but not buy blindly until profit growth catches up with sales.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer