Nucleus Soft. (NUCLEUS)
Slow GrowerFairStock Score: 25/100 — RISKY
Score breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 1/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹703.9 |
| Market Cap | ₹1,853.04 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 17.58 |
| ROCE | 22.6% |
| ROE | 21.45% |
| Dividend Yield | 1.78% |
| Profit Growth | -42.03% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.01 |
| Sales Growth | -6.06% |
| Promoter Holding | 73.6% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹682 — ₹1,084.8 |
| Sector | IT - Software |
| Book Value | ₹344.6 |
Strengths
- Near-zero debt (D/E 0.01) provides strong financial flexibility.
- High promoter holding of 73.60% aligns owner and minority interests.
- Consistently strong returns: ROE 21.45%, ROCE 22.60%.
- Piotroski F-Score 7/9 indicates sound financial health.
- Reasonable valuation with P/E 12.92 and dividend yield 1.58%.
Concerns
- Profit growth of just 0.31% despite sales growth of 6.97% suggests margin pressure.
- PEG ratio of 2.44 indicates the stock is not cheap relative to its slow growth.
- Price has fallen sharply from the 52-week high of ₹1,084.80 to ₹791.40, showing negative momentum.
- FairStock Score 38/100 reflects mixed fundamental signals.
AI Analysis
Nucleus Soft presents an interesting paradox. On one hand, I see a company with a sturdy balance sheet: debt-to-equity of just 0.01, a return on equity of 21.45%, and a return on capital employed of 22.60%. That's the kind of financial discipline I admire. The promoter holding at 73.60% tells me the owners are still heavily invested, aligning their interests with mine. Even the Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 suggests decent operational health. The dividend yield of 1.58% gives me some income while I wait. But the value investor in me asks: where is the growth? Sales expanded only 6.97%, and net profit grew just 0.31% in the latest year. That's hardly a compounding machine. The latest quarter shows sales of ₹220 Cr and net profit of ₹21 Cr, which if annualized is roughly in line with the flat profit growth. At a P/E of 12.92, the market isn't overpaying, but the PEG ratio of 2.44 warns me that this 'cheapness' is not cheap relative to the anaemic growth. The 52-week range—from ₹682 to ₹1,084—shows the stock has been cut in half from its high, and the FairStock Score of 38/100 echoes my mixed feelings. As Graham would say, price is what you pay, value is what you get. I'm getting decent ROE and a clean balance sheet at a reasonable price. But without a catalyst for profit acceleration, this looks like a slow grower rather than a wealth compounder. I'd need to see sustained sales momentum and margin expansion before treating it as a true Buffett-style bargain. For now, it's a watchful hold—respectable, but not exceptional.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer