Network People (NPST)

Fast Grower

FairStock Score: 45/100 — MIXED

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 2/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹1,586.2
Market Cap₹3,309.37 Cr
P/E Ratio76.93
ROCE69.23%
ROE—%
Dividend Yield0.13%
Profit Growth42.2%
Debt/Equity0.03
Sales Growth68%
Promoter Holding60.27%
52-Week Range₹846.6 — ₹2,199.8
SectorIT - Services
Book Value₹147.94

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

Let me look at NPST as an owner, not a trader. The first thing that catches my eye is the economics: ROCE of 69.23% and debt/equity of 0.02. That is a business that earns a lot on capital without borrowing, and the Piotroski score of 7/9 supports the balance-sheet health. Promoter holding of 60.27% also means operating shareholders have real skin in the game. All good. But I must not let a good story make me forget price. At ₹1,219, I am paying 70.46 times trailing earnings and 5.76 times book. The latest quarter net profit is only ₹12 Cr on sales of ₹53 Cr. Annualise that profit and the market cap of ₹2,436 Cr still implies roughly 50 times earnings. That is a rich price for any business, especially an IT-enabled services firm where competitive protection can fade quickly. The dividend yield of 0.17% gives me nothing while I wait. The growth is real: sales grew 147.74% and profit 124.95%. But profit grew slower than sales, so margins are not expanding, and the base is small. A ₹53 Cr quarter can double easily, but it can also wobble. The stock is also nearly 49% below its 52-week high, which tells me the market already has doubts even though the scorecard says mixed at 45/100. Graham taught me to buy with a margin of safety. Here the safety is not in the price; it is in the hope that growth continues. If NPST can keep compounding at these rates for several years, maybe the price becomes fair. But I would need to watch the next few quarters very closely before treating it as a long-term holding.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer