Niraj Ispat Ind. (NIRAJISPAT)

Score breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹211
Market Cap₹12.66 Cr
P/E Ratio8.25
ROCE10.75%
ROE—%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth-25.88%
Debt/Equity—
Sales Growth-1.83%
Promoter Holding74.44%
52-Week Range₹155 — ₹429.65
SectorConsumer Durables

AI Analysis

AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.

A ₹17 crore market cap micro-cap in plastic consumer products. At ₹247, the stock trades at 11.16 times earnings, which seems cheap at first glance. But Graham taught us to value a business on evidence, not optimism. Sales growth is exactly zero, and profit has declined 2.44%. The latest quarter shows sales of just ₹1 crore and net profit of ₹0 crore — rounding to zero. That is not a compounding machine. ROCE is 10.75%, acceptable, but with no dividend and no visible balance sheet data, I cannot judge the real return on equity. The Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 is a red flag: it signals weak financial health and poor operational efficiency. A score of 3 out of 9 would make me suspicious rather than confident. The high promoter holding of 74.44% is a positive — their interests are aligned with minority shareholders. But the stock has swung from ₹155 to ₹485.75 in 52 weeks, which is too volatile for a stable, frugal business. At current price it is about half the upper range. That may lure a bargain hunter, but a low P/E is not meaningful if earnings are flat and quarterly profit is zero. I would need to see years of consistent earnings, a healthy balance sheet, and a clear growth runway before treating this as a Graham bargain. It may be a slow grower at best, or a cyclical facing weak demand. For now, I will stay on the sidelines. There is no margin of safety when the business itself is not proving its earning power.

The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer