Nilkamal Ltd (NILKAMAL)

Cyclical

FairStock Score: 41/100 — MIXED

Score breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹1,860
Market Cap₹2,784.85 Cr
P/E Ratio22.27
ROCE9.57%
ROE7.57%
Dividend Yield1.03%
Profit Growth22%
Debt/Equity0.26
Sales Growth8%
Promoter Holding64.54%
52-Week Range₹1,050.5 — ₹2,150
SectorConsumer Durables
Book Value₹1,057.05

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

Investing is about paying a fair price for a decent business. Nilkamal's numbers tell me this is not a wonderful business by my standards, but it may be a reasonably priced one. The company earns only 7.36% on equity and 9.57% on capital; those returns are mediocre. I would want a higher ROE to call it a franchise. However, it carries only 0.36 debt to equity and promoter holding is high at 64.54%, so existing owners have skin in the game. The reported profit growth of 63.73% is eye-catching, but I must ask whether it is sustainable. Sales grew 12.61%, so there is some genuine demand. At ₹1,330, the P/E is 17.36 and PEG is 0.45, which suggests the market is pricing in continued growth. Yet the latest quarter's net profit of ₹25 crore on sales of ₹962 crore is a very thin margin, so there is little room for error. Book value is ₹840; at 1.58 times book, I am paying a premium for a business that earns modest returns. The 52-week range shows it has fallen from ₹1,960 to ₹1,330, reminding me that Mr Market is moody. I would not call this a stalwart; it looks more like a cyclical or recovery situation where profit has bounced sharply. My discipline: I like the low debt and the 7/9 Piotroski score, but I would only invest if I see margins expanding and the 63% profit growth not being a blip. In the end, a fair price must come with a business I can trust. Nilkamal is not a bad business, but it must prove it can earn better returns on its assets before I get excited. The margin of safety is modest.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer