NGL Fine Chem (NGLFINE)

Fast Grower

FairStock Score: 33/100 — RISKY

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹3,454
Market Cap₹2,133.89 Cr
P/E Ratio44.25
ROCE8.29%
ROE10.65%
Dividend Yield0.05%
Profit Growth99.1%
Debt/Equity0.37
Sales Growth40.7%
Promoter Holding72.74%
52-Week Range₹1,271 — ₹3,602
SectorPharmaceuticals & Biotechnology
Book Value₹532.92

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

I sit with the numbers and ask whether this is a business I understand and a price I can tolerate. NGL Fine Chem operates in pharmaceuticals, with a market cap of ₹1,422 crore and a share price of ₹2,286. The latest quarter shows sales of ₹126 crore and net profit of ₹15 crore. That is encouraging, but one quarter is not a mosaic. Trailing earnings support the current P/E of 47.79, and book value of ₹437.58 gives a P/B of 5.22. These are not Graham-style valuations. A 10.65% ROE and 8.29% ROCE are unimpressive for a company priced like a compounder. The balance sheet is decent—debt/equity is 0.29—and promoter holding at 72.74% aligns owner and management interests. The 45.49% sales growth is real and attractive; the 1,000% profit growth, however, is a low-base optical illusion. A PEG of 0.09 is a mathematical fantasy when the growth rate itself is distorted by a tiny base. Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 tells me recent operations are improving, so there is something real here. But the dividend yield is 0.08%; I am not being paid to wait. The stock has already fallen from a 52-week high of ₹3,602 to ₹2,286, which may look cheaper, but a falling knife is not automatically a bargain. Benjamin Graham said price is what you pay, value is what you get. I cannot find a margin of safety at 47.79 times earnings with a FairStock Score of 30/100 flagged as risky. I would wait for a much lower price or several more quarters of demonstrated earnings power that meaningfully reduces the multiple.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer