Newjaisa Tech (NEWJAISA)

Turnaround

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹124
Market Cap₹57.42 Cr
P/E Ratio0
ROCE-0.44%
ROE—%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth-238.81%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth-31.05%
Promoter Holding61.03%
52-Week Range₹13.35 — ₹124
SectorIT - Hardware

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

Let me begin with the obvious: this is not a business I can value. Newjaisa Tech has a market cap of ₹57 Cr, a price of ₹25.75, and no positive earnings to use in a Graham-style calculation. Book value, ROE, and debt/equity are all unavailable, which by itself is a red flag — I cannot assess the balance sheet or the margin of safety. What is visible is worse. Sales are down 31.05%, profit growth is -238.81%, and the latest quarter shows a net loss of ₹5 Cr against sales of ₹23 Cr. A Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 tells me the company is in poor financial health. ROCE is -0.44%, so even the capital already employed is earning nothing. This is a hardware company in a brutally competitive industry, and I see no moat, no pricing power, and no strategic advantage in the numbers. The only positive is promoter holding of 61.03%, which means insiders have meaningful skin in the game. But ownership alignment cannot make up for a shrinking, loss-making operation. With a 52-week range of ₹13.35 to ₹51.50, the stock has been volatile; a current price near ₹25.75 is hardly a compelling low without fundamental support. There is no dividend to compensate while waiting, and P/E of 0.00 is meaningless when profits are negative. I would put this in the 'too hard' pile. Benjamin Graham taught us to buy with a margin of safety; Newjaisa offers no earnings, no book value, and no clarity. It may be a turnaround candidate one day, but the evidence of a turnaround is absent. In fact, the evidence is deterioration. I prefer a wonderful price in a good business; this is a weak price in a struggling business. I will pass.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer