Nazara Technolo. (NAZARA)
TurnaroundFairStock Score: 8/100 — RISKY
Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹355.9 |
| Market Cap | ₹13,691.33 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 15.13 |
| ROCE | 2.5% |
| ROE | -57.5% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | -67.01% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.06 |
| Sales Growth | -14% |
| Promoter Holding | 35.46% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹215.7 — ₹380 |
| Sector | Entertainment |
| Book Value | ₹79.2 |
Strengths
- Low debt-to-equity of 0.06 provides balance sheet resilience
- Latest quarter shows some scale with ₹406 Cr sales and a small ₹9 Cr net profit
- Promoter holding of 35.46% indicates owner alignment
- Positive ROCE of 2.50% suggests the company is not entirely asset-heavy or loss-making at operating level
Concerns
- P/E of 0.00 and ROE of -57.50% indicate no meaningful annual earnings power
- Sales declined 24.07% and profit fell 67.01%, showing a shrinking business
- P/B of 6.20 is very expensive relative to book value of ₹43.88 and negative returns
- Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 and zero dividend yield add to the risk
- FairStock Score of 0/100 flags severe fundamental risk
AI Analysis
At ₹272.05, Nazara asks me to pay ₹9,810 Cr for a business that earns nothing. The P/E of 0.00 tells the story: there is no annual profit to justify this price. Book value is only ₹43.88, so I am paying 6.20 times book for a company whose return on equity is -57.50%. That is the opposite of the franchise quality I look for. A business that destroys shareholder capital at this rate should trade at a discount to book, not at a premium. Sales are down 24.07% and profits have fallen 67.01%. Latest quarter sales of ₹406 Cr produced just ₹9 Cr of net profit, a razor-thin margin with no clear momentum. ROCE of 2.50% is far below any acceptable hurdle rate. The Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 confirms weak fundamentals across profitability, leverage, and efficiency. There is no dividend yield, so the patient owner receives no income while waiting. On the positive side, debt-to-equity of 0.06 gives the company financial flexibility, and promoter holding of 35.46% shows some skin in the game. But those do not turn this into an investment. Benjamin Graham would say price is what you pay, value is what you get. Here, I see no reliable stream of earnings, no moat visible in the numbers, and no margin of safety. This is not a business I can value with confidence. At best, it is a speculative turnaround. I would not buy; I would wait for proof of durable profitability and a price far below intrinsic value.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer