Nava (NAVA)
StalwartFairStock Score: 73/100 — STEADY
Score breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹572.65 |
| Market Cap | ₹16,227.81 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 21.42 |
| ROCE | 17.17% |
| ROE | 10.31% |
| Dividend Yield | 1.44% |
| Profit Growth | 88.62% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.21 |
| Sales Growth | 20.28% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹887 Cr |
| Promoter Holding | 50.1% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹464.3 — ₹739.2 |
| Sector | Power |
| Book Value | ₹309.02 |
AI Analysis
AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.
I wear two hats. Graham asks: what is it worth, and what am I paying? Nava at ₹572.65 sells above its Graham Number of ₹433.05, leaving a negative margin of safety of -37.54%. The given DCF intrinsic value is only ₹136.89. So by conservative arithmetic, I am not being paid to take valuation risk. Buffett asks: is it a good business? The figures show improving operations: sales grew 20.28%, profit grew 88.62%, and the latest quarter had sales of ₹991 Cr with net profit of ₹326 Cr. The balance sheet is conservative, with debt/equity of 0.21 and free cash flow of ₹887 Cr. Piotroski F-Score is 7/9, which suggests improving fundamentals. ROCE of 17.17% is respectable, though ROE of 10.31% is not exceptional. Promoter holding of 50.10% aligns incentives. But 5-year revenue CAGR is only 7.63%, so the current profit surge may not be a durable long-term compounding rate. PEG of 7.50 looks expensive. Altman Z-Score of 2.44 sits in the grey zone. EV/EBITDA of 0.80 and dividend yield of 1.44% offer some comfort, but P/E of 21.42 and P/B of 1.85 are not bargain-basement. FairStock Score of 73/100 STEADY captures it: steady, not screaming cheap. I would wait for a price closer to the Graham Number or evidence that high profit growth persists. At ₹572.65, this is a watchlist candidate, not a margin-of-safety purchase.
The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer