Naman Industries Proxima (NAMAN)
CyclicalScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹117.35 |
| Market Cap | ₹123.78 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 42.28 |
| ROCE | 14.17% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | -93.14% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 3.65% |
| Promoter Holding | 58.93% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹37 — ₹117.35 |
| Sector | Consumer Durables |
Strengths
- Promoter holding of 58.93% aligns management interests with minority shareholders.
- ROCE of 14.17% suggests the underlying capital employed is generating a reasonable operational return.
- Quarterly sales of ₹69 Cr imply meaningful revenue scale relative to the ₹76 Cr market cap if the top line holds.
- Stock is near the lower end of its 52-week range, reducing sentiment-driven downside if business stabilises.
- Sales growth of 3.65% shows the business is not suffering a top-line collapse.
Concerns
- Latest quarter net profit is ₹0 Cr and profit growth is -93.14%, leaving no current earnings power.
- P/E of 42.28 is misleading and unjustified when profits are collapsing; PEG of 11.58 confirms no growth support.
- Piotroski F-score of 4/9 points to weak financial health and poor operational fundamentals.
- No dividend, no book value disclosure, and no debt/equity data create a serious transparency gap for a retail investor.
AI Analysis
When I look at Naman Industries Proxima, I see a small, essentially profitless furniture business wearing a valuation that suggests success. Market cap is ₹76 Cr, but the latest quarter earned exactly ₹0 Cr on ₹69 Cr of sales. Annualising that gives no earnings power; the reported P/E of 42.28 is meaningless when profits have collapsed by 93.14%. A business that cannot convert ₹69 Cr of quarterly sales into even a rupee of net profit has no margin of safety. Sales growth is a meagre 3.65%, so this is not a growth story. ROCE of 14.17% is not terrible, but with net profit vanishing, that return may be driven by capital employed rather than sustainable operations. The Piotroski F-score of 4 out of 9 reinforces my caution. There is no dividend yield to compensate for waiting, and I don't have book value or debt/equity data — which itself is a red flag at this market cap. Promoter holding of 58.93% does align owners with shareholders, and at ₹59.95 the stock is near the lower end of its 52-week range of ₹40.50 to ₹99.90. But price drops are not my buy signal. I need evidence that earnings are returning before I can call this a turnaround. Furniture is cyclical and tied to housing and discretionary spending; an empty profit line in a decent-sales quarter suggests cost or margin pressure, not just a temporary blip. Benjamin Graham taught me to buy with a margin of safety. Here, the safety is absent. I would rather miss the recovery than pay 42 times earnings for a company that just earned nothing. Let the next few quarters prove the earnings power before I commit a single rupee.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer