Marvel Decor (MDL)
CyclicalScore breakdown: P/E: 1/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹109.9 |
| Market Cap | ₹194.96 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 21.46 |
| ROCE | 8.02% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | -8.3% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 19.64% |
| Promoter Holding | 67.41% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹43 — ₹109.9 |
| Sector | Consumer Durables |
Strengths
- Promoter holding of 67.41% aligns owner interests with minority shareholders.
- Sales growth of 19.64% shows demand traction in the furniture/home furnishing space.
- Latest quarter remains profitable: ₹37 Cr sales and ₹2 Cr net profit.
- Price near the 52-week low offers a cheaper entry only if fundamentals stabilize.
Concerns
- Profit growth is -8.30% despite revenue growth, indicating margin pressure.
- Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 suggests weak financial health and possible deterioration.
- ROCE of 8.02% is mediocre and offers little cushion above capital costs.
- No dividend and missing book value/ROE/debt-equity data make the balance sheet a black box.
AI Analysis
I approach Marvel Decor the way I would any small-cap: with suspicion. A ₹80 crore furniture company with a 21.46 P/E is not cheap unless the business earns high returns on tangible capital and has pricing power. The numbers tell me otherwise. Sales grew 19.64%, but profits fell 8.30%. That tells me growth is being bought, not earned. The latest quarter shows ₹37 crore in sales and ₹2 crore in net profit—a thin margin that can vanish with rising input costs or a demand dip. ROCE of 8.02% is pedestrian; after taxes and reinvestment, little is left for shareholders. The Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 is a red flag—financial health is weak, not improving. There is no dividend, so the investor relies entirely on price appreciation, yet the price has fallen from ₹104.80 to ₹50.90. With book value, ROE and debt/equity not disclosed, I cannot estimate a margin of safety. Graham would insist on tangible assets and stability; this company offers neither. Promoter holding of 67.41% is good alignment, but good owners cannot fix a mediocre business. At a P/E of 21.46 and negative profit growth, the PEG of 1.09 is misleading because the numerator is declining. This looks like a cyclical whose expansion has outrun its profitability. I would wait for evidence that profit growth turns positive, returns on capital exceed 12-15%, and the company can generate cash without excessive debt. Until then, this is a very small, unproven operation, not a compounding machine.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer