Madhav Copper (MCL)
CyclicalScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹57.2 |
| Market Cap | ₹155.26 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 34.67 |
| ROCE | 8.5% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 2.6% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.83 |
| Sales Growth | 74.1% |
| Promoter Holding | 65.21% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹42 — ₹93.2 |
| Sector | Industrial Products |
| Book Value | ₹18.49 |
Strengths
- Promoter holding of 65.21% aligns management interests with public shareholders
- Sales growth of 60.68% shows strong top-line expansion
- Positive ROCE of 8.50% indicates some capital efficiency despite thin margins
- Latest quarter sales of ₹53 crore demonstrate operating scale
Concerns
- Profit growth is negative at -16.48% despite strong sales growth, implying margin compression
- P/E of 51.92 and P/B of 3.28 are expensive for a commodity cyclical with 8.50% ROCE
- Piotroski F-score of 4/9 points to weak financial health and operational deterioration
- No dividend and debt-to-equity of 1.13 leave little shareholder cushion
AI Analysis
When I look at Madhav Copper, I see a small, commodity-linked business selling at a price that assumes far better results than it is currently delivering. The sales growth of 60.68% catches the eye, but any value investor must ask: where is the profit? Profit growth is down 16.48%, and the latest quarter shows ₹53 crore of sales producing just ₹1 crore of net profit. That is a roughly 1.9% net margin—very thin for a business in aluminium and copper products, where pricing power is usually weak and earnings are tied to commodity cycles. The return on capital employed is only 8.50%, and with a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.13, the financial cushion is not strong. The Piotroski F-score of 4 out of 9 also signals fundamental strain, not improvement. At ₹59.93, the stock trades at a P/E of 51.92 and a P/B of 3.28 against a book value of just ₹18.27. Paying over three times book for a business earning mediocre returns on capital is dangerous. The PEG ratio of 0.86 looks tempting, but it is misleading when actual profits are falling. There is no dividend, so the investor depends entirely on price appreciation—an unreliable friend in a cyclical industry. On the positive side, promoter holding of 65.21% does align owners with minority shareholders, and the top line is growing. But sales growth without profit growth in a commodity business is often low-quality growth. This is not a wonderful business at a fair price; it is a cyclical business at an demanding price. I would need a much larger margin of safety before considering an investment.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer