Max India Ltd (MAXIND)
Asset PlayScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹151.13 |
| Market Cap | ₹851.17 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0 |
| ROCE | -23.63% |
| ROE | -0.15% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | -166.2% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.24 |
| Sales Growth | -56.37% |
| Promoter Holding | 49.89% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹120 — ₹241.57 |
| Sector | Finance |
| Book Value | ₹77.74 |
Strengths
- Trades below book value: ₹155.25 market price versus ₹165.16 book value, P/B of 0.94.
- Promoter holding of 49.89% aligns management with minority shareholders.
- Moderate leverage with debt/equity of 0.44, so balance-sheet solvency is not an immediate worry.
- Sales growth of 24.06% suggests some underlying business activity is expanding.
- Holding company structure may offer an asset-based discount that could be unlocked.
Concerns
- Latest quarter lost ₹43 Cr on revenue of ₹43 Cr, making the P/E meaningless and casting doubt on the business model.
- ROCE of -23.63% and ROE of -0.15% indicate poor capital allocation and value destruction.
- Piotroski F-score of 3/9 points to weak financial health and deteriorating fundamentals.
- Zero dividend yield gives shareholders no income while waiting for value to emerge.
AI Analysis
If I look at Max India Ltd, I first remind myself it is a holding company, not an operating business with a simple economic engine. The numbers do not excite me. Revenue grew 24.06%, but profits fell 24.55%, and the latest quarter shows ₹43 Cr of sales against a net loss of ₹43 Cr. A business that cannot earn money has no P/E; the zero reported P/E is meaningless. Return on equity is -0.15%, and return on capital is a dreadful -23.63%. This is capital destruction, not capital compounding. The Piotroski F-score of 3/9 reinforces the point: financial health is weak. On the balance sheet, book value is ₹165.16, and the stock trades at ₹155.25, or 0.94 times book. That catches a value investor's eye, but a cheap price is only interesting if the asset value is real and eventually reflected. Debt/equity of 0.44 is not alarming, and promoter holding of 49.89% is reasonable. Still, there is no dividend to compensate me while I wait, and negative earnings mean the operating franchise is not working. Graham would want a margin of safety that comes from genuine earning power, not just a below-book quote. This looks like an asset play: a holding company with possible underlying value, but also classic value-trap risk. I would not buy today using my usual tests. I need proof that losses are shrinking, assets are being monetised, and management is serious about closing the gap between price and book value.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer