Mawana Sugars (MAWANASUG)
CyclicalScore breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 1/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹116.04 |
| Market Cap | ₹453.91 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 12.24 |
| ROCE | 10.33% |
| ROE | 8.68% |
| Dividend Yield | 3.45% |
| Profit Growth | -69.91% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.8 |
| Sales Growth | 3.78% |
| Promoter Holding | 63.49% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹75.08 — ₹157.8 |
| Sector | Agricultural Food & other Products |
| Book Value | ₹134.13 |
Strengths
- Very low debt-to-equity of 0.02, giving financial stability
- Trading at book value (P/B 1.00), offering asset backing
- Attractive dividend yield of 4.90% for income support
- High promoter holding of 63.49%, aligning interests
Concerns
- Profit growth down 9.30% despite sales growth of 9.74%, showing margin compression
- Latest quarter net profit of ₹4 Cr on sales of ₹367 Cr implies margin under 1%
- Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates weak fundamental health
- Cyclical sugar business with no pricing power and modest ROE of 8.68%
AI Analysis
Looking at Mawana Sugars, I see a business trading at a modest valuation but with telltale signs of cyclical strain. The stock sells at ₹106.23, essentially its book value of ₹106.12, and carries a P/E of 6.48 based on depressed earnings. That low multiple is not necessarily a bargain; profit growth has slipped 9.30% even as sales grew 9.74%, meaning margins are being squeezed. The latest quarter tells the same story: ₹367 Cr of sales produced only ₹4 Cr of net profit, a margin of about one percent. In a commodity business like sugar, such thin returns are a warning that pricing power is absent. On the positive side, the balance sheet is conservative: debt-to-equity is just 0.02, and the company generates a 10.33% ROCE, which is acceptable given the industry. A 4.90% dividend yield provides some return while we wait, and promoter holding at 63.49% aligns interests with minority shareholders. But I am troubled by the Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, which suggests deteriorating financial health beneath the surface. Sugar is a cyclical industry, heavily influenced by government controls, cane prices, and monsoon rainfall. I would not pay a rich multiple for such a business; here, the market is pricing it at book value with a low P/E, which is appropriate. The PEG of 0.67 implies growth is expected, but I see contraction, not growth, in recent profits. If I were to invest, I would demand a margin of safety wider than this. A commodity producer with declining profits and no moat does not deserve my capital unless it is selling at a meaningful discount to its intrinsic assets. Right now, it is merely fairly priced, not cheap.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer