Manaksia Alumi. (MANAKALUCO)
Score breakdown: P/E: 1/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹39.33 |
| Market Cap | ₹257.75 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 34.2 |
| ROCE | 10.53% |
| ROE | 4.8% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.13% |
| Profit Growth | 79.2% |
| Debt/Equity | 1.69 |
| Sales Growth | 3.9% |
| Promoter Holding | 74.87% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹21.73 — ₹68.12 |
| Sector | Non - Ferrous Metals |
| Book Value | ₹21.56 |
AI Analysis
AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.
When I look at Manaksia Alumi, I see a business that demands caution. At ₹32.72, the market cap is ₹185 crore, but the earnings power is thin. The P/E stands at 29.28, yet profit growth is flat at 0.00%. That is not a combination that excites me. A PEG ratio of 14.14 tells me the market is paying a steep price for negligible growth. The return on equity is just 4.80%, far below what I would expect from a quality franchise. The company does earn a ROCE of 10.53%, but that is achieved with a heavy debt-to-equity of 1.94 – leverage can amplify returns, but it also amplifies risk. The latest quarter shows net profit of only ₹2 crore on sales of ₹143 crore, a margin of roughly 1.4%, which is fragile. On the positive side, promoter holding is high at 74.87%, aligning ownership with minority shareholders. The book value of ₹19.33 offers some cushion, and the price is well below the 52-week high of ₹68.12, but a falling price is not automatically a bargain. The Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals weak financial health. This looks like a cyclical aluminium player with no clear moat, high leverage, and stagnant earnings. In Buffett's words, it's far better to buy a wonderful company at a fair price than a fair company at a wonderful price. This is not wonderful. I would keep it on the watchlist, not in the portfolio.
The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer