Lead Reclaim (LRRPL)

Slow Grower

Score breakdown: P/E: 1/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹33
Market Cap₹24.23 Cr
P/E Ratio28.46
ROCE13.15%
ROE—%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth0%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth0%
Promoter Holding59.48%
52-Week Range₹59.15 — ₹96.05
SectorIndustrial Products

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

At first glance, Lead Reclaim is not the kind of business Graham would call a bargain. The market cap is ₹56 Cr, but I can only see a company earning roughly ₹2 Cr per year based on a P/E of 28.46. That means I am paying 28 years' worth of current earnings for a business whose sales and profits are going nowhere. The latest quarter tells the same story: sales of ₹22 Cr and net profit of just ₹1 Cr. That is a thin margin and no evidence of momentum. I am always willing to pay a fair price for a wonderful business, but this looks like a mediocre business at a demanding price. ROCE at 13.15% is passable, but not a bulletproof franchise. With no dividend yield, the only way I make money is if earnings grow or the market pays more for the same earnings, and neither has happened. The Piotroski F-score of 3 out of 9 is a warning light; it suggests weak profitability, leverage, or operating efficiency in recent filings. This is not a company with a durable moat. On the positive side, promoter holding of 59.48% at least keeps management aligned with minority shareholders. And the small scale means if the business turns, there is room to grow. But I do not invest in 'ifs.' I need margin of safety. At ₹79.45, near the middle of its 52-week range, I see no margin of safety. If the company were earning a robust return on capital and reinvesting at high rates, I might look differently. But with zero growth and a 28 P/E, the mathematics do not favor me. For a value investor, this is a pass.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer