Lamosaic India (LAMOSAIC)

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Strengths

• Promoter holding of 69.26% aligns management interests with minority shareholders.
• Latest quarter still generated ₹3 Cr net profit on ₹32 Cr sales, a net margin of about 9.4% despite the downturn.
• ROCE of 11.05% suggests acceptable capital productivity even in a weak phase.
• Price of ₹27.80 is well below the 52-week high of ₹56.25, so much pessimism appears priced in.

Concerns

• Sales growth of -55.51% and profit growth of -73.58% signal a major demand or business contraction.
• Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 indicates weak fundamental health and possible financial stress.
• No book value, ROE, or debt/equity data, and a P/E of 0.00, make it impossible to calculate a reliable margin of safety.
• No dividend yield means shareholders receive no return while waiting for a recovery.

AI Analysis

Lamosaic India is a small-cap laminates and plywood player at ₹27.80 with a ₹27 crore market cap. Frankly, the first thing I notice is what I don't see. There is no book value, no return on equity, no debt-to-equity, and the P/E is showing 0.00. In Graham's language, an investment requires facts, not hopes. These blanks tell me either coverage is thin or the underlying profitability statement is too weak to display. Sales fell 55.51% and profit fell 73.58% — that is not a durable business; that is a business caught in a severe down cycle. The latest quarter does show ₹32 crore sales and ₹3 crore net profit, so operations are not dead. But if I annualise that ₹3 crore blindly, I get a cheap-looking P/E of about 2.3; that is a trap. A company collapsing 55% does not deserve a normal multiple until it proves stabilisation. Return on capital employed of 11.05% is acceptable but not spectacular. Promoter holding of 69.26% aligns owners with management, and the stock trades at ₹27.80, well below the 52-week high of ₹56.25 and closer to the ₹20.45 low. That price range alone tells me the market is uncertain. The Piotroski score of 3/9 is weak, pointing to deteriorating fundamentals. I would not classify this as a moat-worthy stalwart. It is a cyclical business, perhaps in the early stages of a turnaround, but I need years of earnings and a visible balance sheet before I can value it. For now, the margin of safety is unclear. I would watch it, not buy it.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer