Kaveri Seed Co. (KSCL)
CyclicalFairStock Score: 48/100 — MIXED
Score breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹779.95 |
| Market Cap | ₹3,980.93 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 13.7 |
| ROCE | 20.08% |
| ROE | 18.16% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.63% |
| Profit Growth | -15.8% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 18.7% |
| Promoter Holding | 60.5% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹705.1 — ₹1,225 |
| Sector | Agricultural Food & other Products |
| Book Value | ₹414.42 |
Strengths
- Return on equity of 18.45% and ROCE of 20.08% indicate a reasonably profitable seed franchise.
- Sales growth of 20.78% points to healthy demand for Kaveri's products.
- Promoter holding of 60.50% aligns management with minority shareholders.
- At ₹13.21, the P/E is modest if current earnings are sustained.
Concerns
- Net profit fell 15.80% even as sales rose, signaling margin pressure.
- Latest quarter earned only ₹13 Cr profit on ₹210 Cr sales—a weak ~6% net margin.
- Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 suggests deteriorating financial fundamentals.
- P/B of 3.28 is not low for a business with falling profits; PEG of 0.64 appears to use sales growth, not profit growth.
AI Analysis
Kaveri Seed is a business I can understand: it sells seeds to Indian farmers. That is a good starting point. The financials, however, give me a mixed feeling. On the positive side, it earns an ROE of 18.45% and ROCE of 20.08%, which suggest a decent franchise with pricing power. Promoters hold 60.50%, so their interests are aligned with minority shareholders. Debt/equity is shown as N/A, so leverage is not an obvious red flag in these figures. Sales grew 20.78%; that is the kind of demand that comes from good distribution and product performance. But I have to look at profits. Net profit fell 15.80% even as sales grew—that is a red flag. The latest quarter shows the tension: sales of ₹210 Cr produced only ₹13 Cr of net profit, a margin near 6%, lower than what an investor would like from an agri-input company. The Piotroski score of 4/9 also suggests deteriorating financial quality. So while the headline P/E of 13.21 appears cheap, the 'E' in the denominator may be at risk. The P/B of 3.28 tells me the market still charges a premium for book value. The PEG ratio of 0.64 is misleading because it appears to use sales growth, not earnings growth; profit growth is actually negative. As Graham said, the market is a voting machine, not a weighing machine. The 52-week range of ₹705 to ₹1,225 shows volatility. A reasonable owner must ask: is this a temporary monsoon pass-through or a structural squeeze? The valuation is not expensive, but it is no bargain unless seed replacement demand and margins stabilize. I would wait for evidence of profit recovery before planting a large position.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer