KRM Ayurveda (KRMAYURVED)

Slow Grower

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 2/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹222.85
Market Cap₹429.57 Cr
P/E Ratio35.5
ROCE41.83%
ROE—%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth0%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth0%
Promoter Holding69.15%
52-Week Range₹173 — ₹343.95
SectorPharmaceuticals & Biotechnology

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

When I look at KRM Ayurveda, I see a business with some attractive fragments but not a complete mosaic. A promoter holding of 69.15% is good; I like owners with skin in the game. A ROCE of 41.83% is genuinely impressive — if it can be sustained, it suggests the Ayurveda business earns well on invested capital. The latest quarter shows ₹48 Cr of sales and ₹8 Cr of net profit, so there is real economic activity underneath the shares. But the value investor's job is to weigh price against evidence, and here the evidence is mixed. The stock trades at ₹222.85, giving a market cap of ₹430 Cr and a P/E of 35.50. That is a high multiple. The company shows zero sales growth and zero profit growth, and it pays no dividend. Zero growth with a 35 times earnings price means the market is paying for a future that the numbers do not yet confirm. The Piotroski F-Score of 3 out of 9 is a red flag: it indicates weak financial health and poor fundamental scoring. Without book value or ROE data, I am flying partly blind, and Graham would never excuse that. The 52-week range of ₹173.00 to ₹343.95 shows the stock has been volatile; it has fallen materially from its high. This is not necessarily a bargain signal; it can be a warning. If the latest quarter's profit were annualized, it would be much larger than the P/E implies, but I cannot rely on one quarter. I need to see consistency. This looks like a slow grower at best, with no current growth and an expensive multiple. I would keep it on the shelf and wait for lower prices, better growth, or a stronger F-Score.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer