Kriti Industries (KRITI)
Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹67.77 |
| Market Cap | ₹357.12 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 308.05 |
| ROCE | 6.02% |
| ROE | -3.38% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 102.66% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.41 |
| Sales Growth | -22.7% |
| Promoter Holding | 68.72% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹48.69 — ₹120.91 |
| Sector | Industrial Products |
| Book Value | ₹43.49 |
AI Analysis
AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.
As value investors, we begin with earnings. At ₹82.98, Kriti Industries has a market capitalisation of ₹420 crore, but the business earns nothing: P/E is 0.00 and the latest quarter shows net profit of ₹-0 crore. ROE is -3.38%, so equity is being eroded. Sales growth is -35.30%, a severe contraction. The reported profit growth of 102.66% is mathematically real but economically meaningless because it is bouncing off a near-zero base. The balance sheet is not overly stretched, with debt/equity at 0.46, but ROCE of only 6.02% is below what a shareholder should accept. I am being asked to pay ₹82.98 for a share whose book value is ₹34.12, or 2.43 times book, for a company that currently does not earn a return on equity. There is no dividend yield to compensate me. The 52-week range of ₹53 to ₹158 tells me this is a volatile, uncertain situation. Promoter holding of 68.72% is a positive alignment signal, and a Piotroski score of 6/9 suggests some recent financial-strength improvements. But F-score measures past mechanics, not competitive moats. FairStock correctly says insufficient data. This is a possible turnaround, not a proven compounder. I require evidence of stable sales, positive net earnings, and ROE comfortably above the cost of capital before I can pay any premium to book value. Until then, I must pass.
The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer