KKV Agro Powers (KKVAPOW)
CyclicalScore breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹959.6 |
| Market Cap | ₹59.84 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 7.55 |
| ROCE | 10.86% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.68% |
| Profit Growth | 436.78% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | -20.78% |
| Promoter Holding | 69.56% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹350.4 — ₹959.6 |
| Sector | Consumer Durables |
Strengths
- Promoter holding of 69.56% is high, aligning management with minority shareholders.
- P/E of 7.55 is optically cheap, with implied trailing earnings of roughly ₹5.4 Cr against a ₹41 Cr market cap.
- Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 suggests fundamentals are improving rather than deteriorating.
- ROCE of 10.86% is modest but positive for a small, asset-heavy business.
- Latest quarter sales of ₹348 Cr show the company still has operating scale.
Concerns
- Sales growth is negative at -20.78%, indicating weak demand or pricing pressure.
- Latest quarter net margin is only ~1.4% (₹5 Cr profit on ₹348 Cr sales), leaving a very thin cushion.
- Book value, ROE, and Debt/Equity are all N/A, making balance-sheet risk impossible to assess.
- The 436.78% profit growth and PEG of 0.02 are likely low-base effects and are not dependable for valuation.
AI Analysis
At ₹614, this ₹41 Cr gems and jewellery micro-cap has the superficial look of a bargain: P/E of 7.55, a PEG of 0.02, and a 436.78% jump in profit. But Benjamin Graham taught me that a cheap number is not a cheap business. Sales fell 20.78%, and the latest quarter's ₹5 Cr profit on ₹348 Cr of sales is a razor-thin 1.4% margin. In a cyclical trade like gems/jewellery, such thin margins give no cushion; one bad season erases the year. I also cannot compute book value, ROE, or debt/equity from what is reported. That is unacceptable for a Graham investor. If I cannot see net worth or leverage, I cannot measure downside risk. The ROCE of 10.86% is mediocre, not the hallmark of a franchise. The Piotroski score of 6/9 suggests some improvement, and promoter holding of 69.56% at least aligns owner interest. But the 437% profit growth is from a low base, so the PEG ratio of 0.02 is an illusion. A durable grower would show rising sales, not -20.78%. This looks like a possible cyclical recovery or a value trap; I would need years of balance-sheet data and stable sales before acting. In Mr. Market's terms, I am not paid enough to ignore the missing information. For a small-cap Indian jeweller with declining sales, no evident moat, and opaque financials, the margin of safety is too thin. I will pass, unless a full annual report gives me hard evidence of net cash, low debt, and a revival in top line.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer