KKV Agro Powers (KKVAPOW)

Cyclical

Score breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹959.6
Market Cap₹59.84 Cr
P/E Ratio7.55
ROCE10.86%
ROE—%
Dividend Yield0.68%
Profit Growth436.78%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth-20.78%
Promoter Holding69.56%
52-Week Range₹350.4 — ₹959.6
SectorConsumer Durables

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

At ₹614, this ₹41 Cr gems and jewellery micro-cap has the superficial look of a bargain: P/E of 7.55, a PEG of 0.02, and a 436.78% jump in profit. But Benjamin Graham taught me that a cheap number is not a cheap business. Sales fell 20.78%, and the latest quarter's ₹5 Cr profit on ₹348 Cr of sales is a razor-thin 1.4% margin. In a cyclical trade like gems/jewellery, such thin margins give no cushion; one bad season erases the year. I also cannot compute book value, ROE, or debt/equity from what is reported. That is unacceptable for a Graham investor. If I cannot see net worth or leverage, I cannot measure downside risk. The ROCE of 10.86% is mediocre, not the hallmark of a franchise. The Piotroski score of 6/9 suggests some improvement, and promoter holding of 69.56% at least aligns owner interest. But the 437% profit growth is from a low base, so the PEG ratio of 0.02 is an illusion. A durable grower would show rising sales, not -20.78%. This looks like a possible cyclical recovery or a value trap; I would need years of balance-sheet data and stable sales before acting. In Mr. Market's terms, I am not paid enough to ignore the missing information. For a small-cap Indian jeweller with declining sales, no evident moat, and opaque financials, the margin of safety is too thin. I will pass, unless a full annual report gives me hard evidence of net cash, low debt, and a revival in top line.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer